地质环境扰损区灾害生态化防治多元技术配置方法研究

蒋卓君; 崔圣华; 裴向军; 张晓超; 雷泞菲; 李景吉; 杨晴雯

doi:10.3799/dqkx.2026.304

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

地质环境扰损区灾害生态化防治多元技术配置方法研究

更新时间：2026-10-15

- 地质环境扰损区灾害生态化防治多元技术配置方法研究
- An Integrated Multi⁃Technology Configuration Method for Ecological Hazard Prevention and Control in Geologically Disturbed Areas
- 地球科学 2026年51卷第9期页码：3290-3308
- 作者机构：
  
  1.成都理工大学地质灾害防治与地质环境保护全国重点实验室，四川成都 610059
  2.天府永兴实验室，四川成都 610213
- 作者简介：
  
  蒋卓君（2002-），女，博士研究生，主要研究方向是地质灾害与生态减灾. ORCID： 0009⁃0005⁃6466⁃0301. E⁃mail： 1967997334@qq.com
  崔圣华，ORCID：0000⁃0002⁃6638⁃230X. E⁃mail: cuishenghua18@cdut.edu.cn
  裴向军，ORCID：0009⁃0007⁃6529⁃2605. E‐mail：pxj@cdut.edu.cn
- 基金信息：
  
  国家重点研发计划项目(2023YFC3007100)
- DOI：10.3799/dqkx.2026.304
  中图分类号： P642.5
- 收稿：2026-06-21，
  
  纸质出版：2026-09-30
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
蒋卓君，崔圣华，裴向军，张晓超，雷泞菲，李景吉，杨晴雯，2026.地质环境扰损区灾害生态化防治多元技术配置方法研究.地球科学，51（9）：3290-3308.

Jiang Zhuojun，Cui Shenghua，Pei Xiangjun，Zhang Xiaochao，Lei Ningfei，Li Jingji，Yang Qingwen，2026.An Integrated Multi⁃Technology Configuration Method for Ecological Hazard Prevention and Control in Geologically Disturbed Areas.Earth Science，51（9）：3290-3308.
蒋卓君，崔圣华，裴向军，张晓超，雷泞菲，李景吉，杨晴雯，2026.地质环境扰损区灾害生态化防治多元技术配置方法研究.地球科学，51（9）：3290-3308. DOI： 10.3799/dqkx.2026.304.

Jiang Zhuojun，Cui Shenghua，Pei Xiangjun，Zhang Xiaochao，Lei Ningfei，Li Jingji，Yang Qingwen，2026.An Integrated Multi⁃Technology Configuration Method for Ecological Hazard Prevention and Control in Geologically Disturbed Areas.Earth Science，51（9）：3290-3308. DOI： 10.3799/dqkx.2026.304.

摘要

针对地质环境扰损区灾害生态化防治中技术与环境失配、措施割裂及适配依据不足的问题，构建了多元技术有机配置方法.基于工程‒灾害‒生态‒地质子系统耦合关系，建立场景属性识别与生态地质环境问题诊断框架；按照主导功能将治理技术归并为力学补强、水热调控、土壤改良、植被恢复、景观融合和水肥供给六类技术单元.在安全红线和工程适用边界约束下，采用组合赋权与综合评分方法对单元内候选技术进行适宜性评价，并依据技术单元间的前置依赖、功能互补、兼容并存和制约冲突关系生成多元技术配置方案.以震后九寨沟大型崩塌堆积体为例，面向强降雨扰动、高陡松散堆积体、粗粒贫瘠基质和景观敏感等复合约束，构建了以局部稳坡、水土过程调控、土壤生境重构、近自然植被恢复和精准管护为核心的配置方案.该方法可将生态化防治技术选型由经验判断转向场景约束下的系统适配，为复杂地质环境扰损区灾害生态化治理技术配置提供方法支撑.

Abstract

To address technology-environment mismatch

fragmented implementation of individual measures

and insufficient basis for technology adaptation in the ecological prevention and control of hazards in geologically disturbed areas

an integrated multi-technology configuration method is developed. Based on the coupling relationships among the engineering

hazard

ecological

and geological subsystems

a framework for scenario attribute identification and eco-geological environmental problem diagnosis is established. According to their dominant functions

treatment technologies are classified into six technical units: mechanical reinforcement

hydrothermal regulation

soil improvement

vegetation restoration

landscape integration

and water-fertilizer supply. Subject to safety redlines and engineering applicability constraints

candidate technologies within each technical unit are evaluated for suitability using combined weighting and comprehensive scoring methods

and multi-technology configuration schemes are generated according to prerequisite dependencies

functional complementarity

compatibility

and potential conflicts among the technical units. A large post-earthquake collapse deposit in Jiuzhaigou is taken as a case study. Under the combined constraints of intense rainfall disturbance

steep and loose deposits

coarse and infertile substrates

and high landscape sensitivity

a configuration scheme centered on local slope stabilization

soil and water process regulation

soil habitat reconstruction

near-natural vegetation restoration

and targeted maintenance is developed. The proposed method can transform ecological prevention and control technology selection from experience-based judgment to systematic adaptation under scenario constraints

thereby providing methodological support for technology configuration in the ecological treatment of hazards in complex geologically disturbed areas.

关键词

Keywords

references

Adhikari, I., Baral, A., Zahed, E., et al., 2021. Early Stage Multi⁃Criteria Decision Support System for Recommending Slope Repair Methods. Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems , 38 ( 2 ): 127 - 144 . https://doi.org/10.1080/10286608.2021.1923699

Anderson, C. C., Renaud, F. G., Hanscomb, S., et al., 2022. Green, Hybrid, or Grey Disaster Risk Reduction Measures: What Shapes Public Preferences for Nature⁃Based Solutions? Journal of Environmental Management , 310 : 114727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114727

Broquet, M., Cabral, P., Campos, F. S., 2024. What Ecological Factors to Integrate in Landslide Susceptibility Mapping? An Exploratory Review of Current Trends in Support of Eco⁃DRR. Progress in Disaster Science , 22 : 100328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdisas.2024.100328

Cardinale, B. J., Duffy, J. E., Gonzalez, A., et al., 2012. Biodiversity Loss and Its Impact on Humanity. Nature , 486 ( 7401 ): 59 - 67 . https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11148

Crozier, M. J., 2010. Deciphering the Effect of Climate Change on Landslide Activity: A Review. Geomorphology , 124(3-4): 260-267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2010.04.009

Fan, X. M., Scaringi, G., Korup, O., et al., 2019. Earthquake⁃Induced Chains of Geologic Hazards: Patterns, Mechanisms, and Impacts. Reviews of Geophysics , 57 ( 2 ): 421 - 503 . https://doi.org/10.1029/2018rg000626

Fell, R., Corominas, J., Bonnard, C., et al., 2008. Guidelines for Landslide Susceptibility, Hazard and Risk Zoning for Land Use Planning. Engineering Geology , 102(3-4): 85-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2008.03.022

Gann, G. D., McDonald, T., Walder, B., et al., 2019. International Principles and Standards for the Practice of Ecological Restoration (Second Edition). Restoration Ecology , 27(S1): S1-S46.

Ghestem, M., Sidle, R. C., Stokes, A., 2011. The Influence of Plant Root Systems on Subsurface Flow: Implications for Slope Stability. BioScience , 61 ( 11 ): 869 - 879 . https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2011.61.11.6

Gill, J. C., Malamud, B. D., 2014. Reviewing and Visualizing the Interactions of Natural Hazards. Reviews of Geophysics , 52 ( 4 ): 680 - 722 . https://doi.org/10.1002/2013RG000445

Greco, S., Ishizaka, A., Tasiou, M., et al., 2019. On the Methodological Framework of Composite Indices: A Review of the Issues of Weighting, Aggregation, and Robustness. Social Indicators Research , 141 ( 1 ): 61 - 94 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205⁃017⁃1832⁃9

Guo, K., Zhang, X. C., Liu, J. M., et al., 2020. Establishment of an Integrated Decision⁃Making Method for Planning the Ecological Restoration of Terrestrial Ecosystems. Science of the Total Environment , 741 : 139852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139852

Hu, X. D., Gao, J. Z., Zhou, M. T., et al., 2021. Evaluating the Success of Engineering Disturbed Slope Eco⁃Restoration in the Alpine Region, Southeast Qinghai⁃Tibet Plateau, China. Journal of Mountain Science , 18 ( 11 ): 2820 - 2832 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629⁃020⁃6502⁃8

Huang, F. M., Chen, J., Yang, Y., et al., 2025. A Review and Prospect of Disaster⁃Causing Environmental Factors Related to Landslide Susceptibility Prediction. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology , 44 ( 2 ): 14 - 37 (in Chinese with English abstract) .

Huang, I. B., Keisler, J., Linkov, I., 2011. Multi⁃Criteria Decision Analysis in Environmental Sciences: Ten Years of Applications and Trends. Science of the Total Environment , 409 ( 19 ): 3578 - 3594 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.06.022

Joseph, J. K., Akhildev, K., Renjith, V. R., et al., 2024. Eco⁃DRR Practices and Research: Visualization and Analysis of Global Perspectives. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction , 102 : 104271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104271

Keesstra, S., Nunes, J., Novara, A., et al., 2018. The Superior Effect of Nature Based Solutions in Land Management for Enhancing Ecosystem Services. Science of the Total Environment , 610 : 997 - 1009 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.077

Li, P. X., Wang, B., Chen, P., et al., 2023. Vulnerability Assessment of the Eco⁃Geo⁃Environment of Mining Cities in Arid and Semi⁃Arid Areas: A Case Study from Zhungeer, China. Ecological Indicators , 152 : 110364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110364

Lin, W. T., Lin, C. Y., Chou, W. C., 2006. Assessment of Vegetation Recovery and Soil Erosion at Landslides Caused by a Catastrophic Earthquake: A Case Study in Central Taiwan. Ecological Engineering , 28 ( 1 ): 79 - 89 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2006.04.005

Liu, C. Z., Chen, C. L., 2 020. Achievements and Countermeasures in Risk Reduction of Geological Disasters in China. Journal of Engineering Geology , 28 ( 2 ): 375 - 383 (in Chinese with English abstract) .

Liu, X. J., Tan, T. T., Bai, Y., et al., 2022. Restoration Performance of Regional Soil and Water Resources in China Based on Index of Coupling and Improved Assessment Tool. Alexandria Engineering Journal , 61 ( 7 ): 5677 - 5686 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2021.10.063

Lü, Y. L., Cui, S. H., Pei, X. J., et al., 2026. Exploration of Durability Evaluation for Ecological Remediation Engineering in Geological Hazard Governance. Earth Science , 51 ( 9 ): 3422 - 3432 (in Chinese with English abstract) .

Metzger, J. P., Esler, K., Krug, C., et al., 2017. Best Practice for the Use of Scenarios for Restoration Planning. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability , 29 : 14 - 25 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2017.10.004

Pei, X. J., 2024. Mechanisms of Geological Environment Disturbance and Ecological Restoration Technical Systems for Major Engineering Projects on the Tibetan Plateau. Journal of Engineering Geology , 32 ( 5 ): 1737 - 1758 (in Chinese with English abstract) .

Preti, F., 2013. Forest Protection and Protection Forest: Tree Root Degradation over Hydrological Shallow Landslides Triggering. Ecological Engineering , 61 : 633 - 645 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2012.11.009

Reichenbach, P., Rossi, M., Malamud, B. D., et al., 2018. A Review of Statistically⁃Based Landslide Susceptibility Models. Earth⁃Science Reviews , 180 : 60 - 91 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2018.03.001

Rey, F., Bifulco, C., Bischetti, G. B., et al., 2019. Soil and Water Bioengineering: Practice and Research Needs for Reconciling Natural Hazard Control and Ecological Restoration. Science of the Total Environment , 648 : 1210 - 1218 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.217

Shen, Y. F., Li, Q., Pei, X. J., et al., 2023. Ecological Restoration of Engineering Slopes in China—A Review. Sustainability , 15 (6): 5354. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15065354

Shi, P. J., Ye, T., Wang, Y., et al., 2020. Disaster Risk Science: A Geographical Perspective and a Research Framework. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science , 11 ( 4 ): 426 - 440 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753⁃020⁃00296⁃5

Stokes, A., Douglas, G. B., Fourcaud, T., et al., 2014. Ecological Mitigation of Hillslope Instability: Ten Key Issues Facing Researchers and Practitioners. Plant and Soil , 377 ( 1 ): 1 - 23 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104⁃014⁃2044⁃6

Vaidya, O. S., Kumar, S., 2006. Analytic Hierarchy Process: An Overview of Applications. European Journal of Operational Research , 169 ( 1 ): 1 - 29

Wang, M., Liu, Q. H., Pang, X. Y., 2021. Evaluating Ecological Effects of Roadside Slope Restoration Techniques: A Global Meta⁃Analysis. Journal of Environmental Management , 281 : 111867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111867

Wortley, L., Hero, J. M., Howes, M., 2013. Evaluating Ecological Restoration Success: A Review of the Literature. Restoration Ecology , 21 ( 5 ): 537 - 543 . https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.12028

Xu, Q., Chen, W. L., Zhao, K. Y., et al., 2021. Effects of Land⁃Use Management on Soil Erosion: A Case Study in a Typical Watershed of the Hilly and Gully Region on the Loess Plateau of China. Catena , 206 : 105551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2021.105551

Zhang, Z . G., Chen, G., Zhang, J. X., 2025. Development Characteristics and Disaster Model of Geological Disasters in Suzhou, Wuxi and Changzhou Areas. Yangtze River , 56(S1): 163-169 (in Chinese with English abstract) .

Zhang, H. W., Wang, Z. Q., 2022. Human Activities and Natural Geographical Environment and Their Interactive Effects on Sudden Geologic Hazard: A Perspective of Macro⁃Scale and Spatial Statistical Analysis. Applied Geography , 143 : 102711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2022.102711

Zhao, B. Q., Xia, Z. Y., Xu, W. N., et al., 2017. Review on Research of Slope Eco⁃Restoration Technique for Engineering Disturbed Area. Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering , 48 ( 2 ): 130 - 137 (in Chinese with English abstract) .

Zhao, Y., Zhao, C. L., Zheng, L. F., et al., 2025. Integrated Ecological Restoration Techniques System for Waste Dumps of Typical Open⁃Pit Coal Mine in Alpine Grassland: A Case Study of a Six⁃Year Restoration Project in Huolinhe South Open⁃Pit Mine. Ecological Frontiers , 45 ( 3 ): 678 - 688 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecofro.2025.01.006

浏览量

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

地质灾害生态化治理工程耐久性评估指标研究

“苔‒藻”生物结皮对工程弃渣的改良作用

藏东南八宿县林卡乡高位古滑坡群的孕灾条件与形成机制

冻融环境陡立边坡生态修复植生层优化及性能演化

南岭地区正冲锂铷铯矿床云英斑岩成因