MT与WFEM二维联合反演在山西大同地热区的应用

谢子豪; 陈宇峰; 刘磊; 周文龙; 廖卫阳; 杨鑫

doi:10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.tb20250048

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

MT与WFEM二维联合反演在山西大同地热区的应用

地球物理探测技术与应用 | 更新时间：2026-11-05

- MT与WFEM二维联合反演在山西大同地热区的应用
- MT与WFEM二维联合反演在山西大同地热区的应用
- 地质科技通报 2025年第4期页码：368-378
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 中国地质大学(武汉)地球物理与空间信息学院
  2. 安徽省地勘局第一水文工程地质勘查院
  3. 资源与生态环境地质湖北省重点实验室
  4. 湖北省地质局地球物理勘探大队
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  湖北省地质局地质科研项目“地下空间地质结构与资源探测技术应用研究”（KJ2023-37）;资源与生态环境地质湖北省重点实验室开放基金资助项目（HBREGKFJJ-202310）
- DOI：10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.tb20250048
  中图分类号： P314;P631.325
- 网络首发：2025-07-02，
  
  纸质出版：2025-07-02
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
谢子豪, 陈宇峰, 刘磊, 等. MT与WFEM二维联合反演在山西大同地热区的应用[J]. 地质科技通报, 2025,(4):368-378.

谢子豪, 陈宇峰, 刘磊, et al. MT与WFEM二维联合反演在山西大同地热区的应用[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology, 2025, (4): 368-378.
谢子豪, 陈宇峰, 刘磊, 等. MT与WFEM二维联合反演在山西大同地热区的应用[J]. 地质科技通报, 2025,(4):368-378. DOI： 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.tb20250048.

谢子豪, 陈宇峰, 刘磊, et al. MT与WFEM二维联合反演在山西大同地热区的应用[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology, 2025, (4): 368-378. DOI： 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.tb20250048.

摘要

地热能凭借其稳定性、经济性等优势已成为新型清洁能源体系构建的关键方向。电磁法作为解析地热系统电性结构的核心地球物理手段，其方法体系呈现显著互补特征：大地电磁法（magnetotelluric，简称MT）利用天然交变电磁场，具有探测深度大、对深部低阻异常体灵敏等特点，但极易受到电磁环境噪声的影响；广域电磁法（wide-field electromagnetic method，简称WFEM）采用人工场源，抗干扰性能强、对浅部异常体及细小断裂分辨率较高。为充分发挥MT和WFEM的优势互补效应，采用二维联合反演方法，探讨了MT与WFEM联合反演在地热勘探过程中的可行性和有效性。理论模型合成数据测试表明，相比于单独反演结果，MT与WFEM二维联合反演能够更为清晰地刻画地热系统的盖层及热储层分布特征。最后，对山西大同地热区实测MT及WFEM数据分别单独反演和联合反演，并进行了对比分析。研究结果显示联合反演结果要显著优于MT或WFEM单独反演结果，有助于圈定出地热系统的重要组成部分。根据联合反演所得的电阻率分布结构，结合测区地质及其他资料，推断出了该地区地热系统的概念模型。

Abstract

ObjectiveGeothermal energy

owing to its stability and economic advantages

has become a crucial direction in the construction of new clean energy systems. MethodsElectromagnetic methods are core geophysical techniques for resolving the electrical structure of geothermal systems and exhibit distinct complementary features. The magnetotelluric (MT) method uses natural alternating electromagnetic fields with the advantages of high detection depth and sensitivity to deep low resistance bodies

but it is susceptible to the influence of electromagnetic environmental noise. Wide-field electromagnetic method(WFEM) utilizes artificial field sources

exhibiting strong anti-interference capabilities and showing higher resolution for shallow anomalous bodies and small fractures. This study explores the complementarity and effectiveness of MT and WFEM in geothermal exploration through a two-dimensional joint inversion method. ResultsTheoretical models and synthetic data tests have shown that two-dimensional joint inversion combines the respective advantages of MT and WFEM

and can more clearly characterize the cap rock and thermal reservoir structure of geothermal systems. This paper conducted a joint inversion study on the measured data of MT and WFEM in a geothermal area in Datong

Shanxi

China. The results showed that the resistivity distribution obtained from the joint inversion clearly characterized shallow fault channels and deep thermal reservoirs. ConclusionBased on the resistivity structure model obtained from joint inversion and other geological data

a conceptual model of the geothermal system in the region was constructued

providing a reference basis for the precise exploration of geothermal resources in the future.

关键词

Keywords

references

吴强.地球物理方法在地热勘探中的应用研究[D].成都理工大学,2018(01).

何继善, 著.广域电磁法和伪随机信号电法[M].高等教育出版社,2010.

Ahumada M.F.,Guevara L.,Favetto A.,Filipovich R.,Chiodi A.,Viramonte J.G.,Giordano G..Electrical resistivity structure in the Tocomar geothermal system obtained from 3-D inversion of audio-magnetotelluric data (Central Puna, NW Argentina)[J].Geothermics,2022.

Omollo Philip,Nishijima Jun,Fujimitsu Yasuhiro,Sawayama Kazuki.Resistivity structural imaging of the Olkaria Domes geothermal field in Kenya using 2D and 3D MT Data inversion[J].Geothermics,2022.

Zhao Gui,Liu Yanguang,Hu Longhua,Bian Kai,Qin Shenjun,Liu Feng,Hu Jing.Inversion of the Temperature and Depth of Geothermal Reservoirs Using Controlled Source Audio Frequency Magnetotellurics and Hydrogeochemical Method[J].Frontiers in Earth Science,2022.

Maryadi Maryadi,Mizunaga Hideki.Subsurface temperature estimation in a geothermal field based on audio-frequency magnetotelluric data[J].Exploration Geophysics,2022.

Athens Noah D.,Caers Jef K..Gravity inversion for geothermal exploration with uncertainty quantification[J].Geothermics,2021.

Bretaudeau F,Dubois F,Bissavetsy Kassa S-G,Coppo N,Wawrzyniak P,Darnet M.Time-lapse resistivity imaging: CSEM-data 3-D double-difference inversion and application to the Reykjanes geothermal field[J].Geophysical Journal International,2021.

J. Araya Vargas,N. M. Meqbel,O. Ritter,H. Brasse,U. Weckmann,G. Yáñez,B. Godoy.Fluid Distribution in the Central Andes Subduction Zone Imaged With Magnetotellurics[J].Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth,2019.

Biruk Abera Cherkose,Hideki Mizunaga.Resistivity imaging of Aluto-Langano geothermal field using 3-D magnetotelluric inversion[J].Journal of African Earth Sciences,2018.

Huiqian Zhang,Qinghua Huang,Guoze Zhao,Zhen Guo,Y. John Chen.Three-dimensional conductivity model of crust and uppermost mantle at the northern Trans North China Orogen: Evidence for a mantle source of Datong volcanoes[J].Earth and Planetary Science Letters,2016.

Gerard Muñoz.Exploring for Geothermal Resources with Electromagnetic Methods[J].Surveys in Geophysics,2014.

Maxwell A. Meju.Geoelectromagnetic Exploration For Natural Resources: Models, Case Studies And Challenges[J].Surveys in Geophysics,2002.

ólafur G. Flóvenz,Lúdvík S. Georgsson,Knútur árnason.Resistivity structure of the upper crust in Iceland[J].Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth,1985(B12).

A. Berktold.Electromagnetic studies in geothermal regions[J].Geophysical Surveys,1983(1).

Archie, G.E..The Electrical Resistivity Log as an Aid in Determining Some Reservoir Characteristics[J].Transactions of the AIME,1942(01).

朱悦,彭荣华,胡祥云,周文龙,黄顺聪,鲁杏.基于变维度贝叶斯反演的地热黏土盖层音频大地电磁探测能力研究[J].地质科技通报,2024(03).

王方,熊杰,田慧潇,李思平,康佳帅.基于深度学习的大地电磁二维反演方法[J].地质科技通报,2024(02).

邵炳松,阮传侠,赵苏民,朱怀亮,石峰,杨坡,马振波,马艳飞,刘志龙,李向宝.广域电磁法在郑州地区深部地热资源勘查中的应用[J].地质与勘探,2023(02).

崔健,邓荻,张海东,阮娟,岑超,宋涛.广域电磁法在苏北盆地厚覆盖区地热勘查中的应用[J].地质与资源,2023(01).

吴佳文,胡祥云,黄国疏,彭荣华,周文龙.地热资源电磁法勘探现状及展望[J].地球学报,2023(01).

潘良云,孟令箭,孙福利,杨文军,张玮,任路,薛慧,周博,杨慧.山西大同盆地北部地热地质特征及资源潜力[J].中国地质,2023(06).

刘德民,韦梅华,孙明行,张昌生,关俊朋,康志强,祁焱雅,张小波,周天禹.干热岩控热构造系统厘定与类型划分[J].地球科学,2022(10).

古志文,田红军,王安平,李胜良.广域电磁法在川南地区温泉勘查方面的应用[J].四川地质学报,2021(04).

李德,郭妙连.中国地热资源现状与未来发展趋势[J].化工设计通讯,2021(05).

危志峰,陈后扬,吴西全.广域电磁法在宜春某地地热勘查中的应用[J].物探与化探,2020(05).

李文,孔祥军,袁利娟,高剑,沈鹏飞,冯浩,郝伟俊,何云成.中国地热资源概况及开发利用建议[J].中国矿业,2020(S1).

孙海川.CSAMT和MT在兰州新区地热勘查中的应用探讨[J].地下水,2020(01).

王贵玲,刘彦广,朱喜,张薇.中国地热资源现状及发展趋势[J].地学前缘,2020(01).

陈昌昕,严加永,周文月,王志辉,张代磊.地热地球物理勘探现状与展望[J].地球物理学进展,2020(04).

张文科,徐玺萍,李聪.CSAMT及MT在寻找城市地热资源中的应用[J].青海大学学报,2019(04).

彭荣华,胡祥云,韩波.基于高斯牛顿法的频率域可控源电磁三维反演研究[J].地球物理学报,2016(09).

岑敏,董树文,施炜,周涛发,陈龙,陈兴强.大同盆地形成机制的构造研究[J].地质论评,2015(06).

吴桂桔,胡祥云,霍光谱,周晓晨.Geophysical Exploration for Geothermal Resources:An Application of MT and CSAMT in Jiangxia,Wuhan,China[J].Journal of Earth Science,2012(05).

毕玉荣.地热资源开发应用现状及前景综述[J].石油石化节能,2011(10).

浏览量

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

西藏卡吾地热水地球化学特征及其成因机制

水文地球化学方法在地热资源勘查中的应用：以湖北省应城市为例

不同类型地热水硼的地球化学特征及对地热系统成因机制的指示

三维数字岩心孔喉特征与驱替参数对渗流驱替能力影响——以鄂尔多斯盆地富县地区长8油层组致密油储层为例

基于深度学习的复杂页岩储层多参数协同高效预测——以松辽盆地青山口组为例