1. 中国石油大学(华东)地球科学与技术学院
2. 中国石油化工股份有限公司胜利油田分公司滨南采油厂
3. 山东石油化工学院
纸质出版:2025
移动端阅览
高波, 郝芳, 张志垚. 渤海湾盆地东营凹陷沙四上亚段页岩储层特征及主控因素[J]. 地质科技通报, 2025,44(3):70-81.
高波, 郝芳, 张志垚. 渤海湾盆地东营凹陷沙四上亚段页岩储层特征及主控因素[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology, 2025, 44(3): 70-81.
高波, 郝芳, 张志垚. 渤海湾盆地东营凹陷沙四上亚段页岩储层特征及主控因素[J]. 地质科技通报, 2025,44(3):70-81. DOI: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.tb20240707.
高波, 郝芳, 张志垚. 渤海湾盆地东营凹陷沙四上亚段页岩储层特征及主控因素[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology, 2025, 44(3): 70-81. DOI: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.tb20240707.
中国陆相页岩油资源十分丰富,是常规油气的重要战略接替领域,其中页岩储层发育影响因素是页岩油富集机理研究的重点和难点之一。以渤海湾盆地东营凹陷沙四上亚段页岩为研究对象,通过X射线衍射(XRD)、气体吸附、高压压汞、场发射扫描电镜(FE-SEM)和聚焦离子束扫描电镜(FIB-SEM)等技术手段,明确了沙河街组页岩岩相类型,精细表征了页岩储集空间类型与结构,揭示了页岩孔隙发育影响因素。结果表明:(1)研究区沙四上亚段页岩主要发育5种岩相类型(富有机质纹层状钙质页岩、富有机质纹层状混合质页岩、富有机质层状混合质页岩、富有机质块状钙质页岩和含有机质纹层状钙质页岩);(2)页岩储集空间类型以粒间孔、粒内溶孔、晶间孔和微裂缝为主,有机孔基本不发育,不同类型页岩孔隙结构存在明显差异,其中富有机质纹层状页岩孔体积较大;(3)有机质丰度和沉积构造(纹层)对页岩储层具有明显的控制作用,有机酸溶蚀作用形成大量溶蚀孔,增加页岩储集性能,而过高的有机质丰度使页岩塑性增强,不利于孔隙的保存。纹层结构有利于页岩的储集性,不同纹层储集性存在显著差异,长英质纹层储集性较好,黏土质纹层次之,粗晶方解石纹层相对较差。研究结果揭示了东营凹陷沙四上亚段页岩储层特征以及有机质丰度和纹层结构对储层发育的控制作用,对渤海湾盆地陆相页岩油勘探开发有一定的参考意义。
秦洋.致密储层微观孔隙结构与连通性研究[D].南京大学,2021(05).
Zhao Rixin,Xue Haitao,Lu Shuangfang,Li Junqian,Tian Shansi,wang Min,Dong Zhentao.Multi-scale pore structure characterization of lacustrine shale and its coupling relationship with material composition: An integrated study of multiple experiments[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology,2022.
Shang Xu,Fang Hao,Zhiguo Shu,Aihua Zhang,Feng Yang.Pore structures of different types of shales and shale gas exploration of the Ordovician Wufeng and Silurian Longmaxi successions in the eastern Sichuan Basin, South China[J].Journal of Asian Earth Sciences,2020.
Tingwei Li,Zhenxue Jiang,Pibo Su,Xi Zhang,Weitao Chen,Xiaoyan Wang,Chuanxiang Ning,Zhi Wang,Zixin Xue.Effect of laminae development on pore structure in the lower third member of the Shahejie Shale, Zhanhua Sag, Eastern China[J].Interpretation,2020.
Key Laboratory of Tectonics and Petroleum Resources, Ministry of Education, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China,Key Laboratory of Tectonics and Petroleum Resources, Ministry of Education, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China,School of Geosciences, China University of Petroleum, Qingdao 266580, China,Key Laboratory of Tectonics and Petroleum Resources, Ministry of Education, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China,Exploration and Development Research Institute, Sinopec Jianghan Oilfield Company, Wuhan 430074, China,Exploration and Development Research Institute, Sinopec Jianghan Oilfield Company, Wuhan 430074, China,Key Laboratory of Tectonics and Petroleum Resources, Ministry of Education, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China,Key Laboratory of Tectonics and Petroleum Resources, Ministry of Education, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China,Key Laboratory of Tectonics and Petroleum Resources, Ministry of Education, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China,Key Laboratory of Tectonics and Petroleum Resources, Ministry of Education, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China,Key Laboratory of Tectonics and Petroleum Resources, Ministry of Education, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China,Key Laboratory of Tectonics and Petroleum Resources, Ministry of Education, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China.Full-scale pores and micro-fractures characterization using FE-SEM, gas adsorption, nano-CT and micro-CT: A case study of the Silurian Longmaxi Formation shale in the Fuling area, Sichuan Basin, China[J].Fuel,2019.
School of Geosciences, China University of Petroleum, Qingdao 266580, China,Laboratory for Marine Mineral Resource, Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology, Qingdao 266071, China,State Key Laboratory of Shale Oil and Gas Enrichment Mechanisms and Effective Development, China,School of Geosciences, China University of Petroleum, Qingdao 266580, China,Laboratory for Marine Mineral Resource, Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology, Qingdao 266071, China,School of Geosciences, China University of Petroleum, Qingdao 266580, China,Laboratory for Marine Mineral Resource, Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology, Qingdao 266071, China,School of Energy Resource, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China,Exploration and Production Research Institute, SINOPEC, Beijing 100083, China,School of Geosciences, China University of Petroleum, Qingdao 266580, China.Diagenetic variation at the lamina scale in lacustrine organic-rich shales: Implications for hydrocarbon migration and accumulation[J].Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta,2018.
Quanzhong Guan,Dazhong Dong,Shufang Wang,Jinliang Huang,Yuman Wang,Hui Lu,Chenchen Zhang.Preliminary study on shale gas microreservoir characteristics of the Lower Silurian Longmaxi Formation in the southern Sichuan Basin, China[J].Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering,2016.
C.R. Clarkson,N. Solano,R.M. Bustin,A.M.M. Bustin,G.R.L. Chalmers,L. He,Y.B. Melnichenko,A.P. Radliński,T.P. Blach.Pore structure characterization of North American shale gas reservoirs using USANS/SANS, gas adsorption, and mercury intrusion[J].Fuel,2013.
Mark E. Curtis,Brian J. Cardott,Carl H. Sondergeld,Chandra S. Rai.Development of organic porosity in the Woodford Shale with increasing thermal maturity[J].International Journal of Coal Geology,2012.
Gareth R. Chalmers,R. Marc Bustin,Ian M. Power.Characterization of gas shale pore systems by porosimetry, pycnometry, surface area, and field emission scanning electron microscopy/transmission electron microscopy image analyses: Examples from the Barnett, Woodford, Haynesville, Marcellus, and Doig units[J].AAPG Bulletin,2012.
Andrew C. Aplin,Joe H. S. Macquaker.Mudstone diversity: Origin and implications for source, seal, and reservoir properties in petroleum systems[J].AAPG Bulletin,2011.
Ross Daniel J.K.,Bustin R. Marc.Investigating the use of sedimentary geochemical proxies for paleoenvironment interpretation of thermally mature organic-rich strata: Examples from the Devonian–Mississippian shales, Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin[J].Chemical Geology,2008.
文杰,徐尚,苟启洋,赵同旭,王宇帆,刘秉昌,温康.页岩油微运移研究进展及意义[J].地质科技通报,2024(04).
万佳林,于志超,黄文辉.陆相纹层型页岩油储集空间特征及其控制因素——以松辽盆地长岭凹陷青山口组页岩为例[J].天然气地球科学,2024(09).
朱如凯,张婧雅,李梦莹,蔡毅,吴松涛,刘畅,张素荣,康缘.陆相页岩油富集基础研究进展与关键问题[J].地质学报,2023(09).
杨勇.济阳陆相断陷盆地页岩油富集高产规律[J].油气地质与采收率,2023(01).
邹才能,马锋,潘松圻,张新顺,吴松涛,傅国友,王红军,杨智.全球页岩油形成分布潜力及中国陆相页岩油理论技术进展[J].地学前缘,2023(01).
周立宏,陈长伟,甘华军,张广旭,张亦康,刘海涛,陈思,李志胜.歧口凹陷沙一下亚段页岩形成环境及页岩油潜力综合评价[J].地质科技通报,2022(05).
刘惠民.济阳坳陷古近系页岩油地质特殊性及勘探实践——以沙河街组四段上亚段—沙河街组三段下亚段为例[J].石油学报,2022(05).
胡素云,白斌,陶士振,卞从胜,张天舒,陈燕燕,梁晓伟,王岚,朱如凯,贾进华,潘哲君,李思洋,刘羽汐.中国陆相中高成熟度页岩油非均质地质条件与差异富集特征[J].石油勘探与开发,2022(02).
曾宏斌,王芙蓉,罗京,陶涛,吴世强.基于低温氮气吸附和高压压汞表征潜江凹陷盐间页岩油储层孔隙结构特征[J].地质科技通报,2021(05).
匡立春,侯连华,杨智,吴松涛.陆相页岩油储层评价关键参数及方法[J].石油学报,2021(01).
徐良伟,杨克基,鲁文婷,李霄,魏浩.富有机质泥页岩微纳米孔隙系统演化特征及模式研究新进展[J].沉积学报,2022(01).
姜振学,李廷微,宫厚健,姜涛,常佳琦,宁传祥,苏思远,陈委涛.沾化凹陷低熟页岩储层特征及其对页岩油可动性的影响[J].石油学报,2020(12).
高凤琳,宋岩,梁志凯,李卓,原园,张瀛涵,陈磊,郭望.陆相页岩有机质孔隙发育特征及成因——以松辽盆地长岭断陷沙河子组页岩为例[J].石油学报,2019(09).
葛岩,万欢,黄志龙,潘新志,仲米剑.页岩气储层微观孔隙结构影响因素及“三元”耦合控制作用[J].油气地质与采收率,2018(05).
王玉满,李新景,陈波,吴伟,董大忠,张鉴,韩京,马杰,代兵,王浩,蒋珊.海相页岩有机质炭化的热成熟度下限及勘探风险[J].石油勘探与开发,2018(03).
卢双舫,李俊乾,张鹏飞,薛海涛,王国力,张俊,刘惠民,李政.页岩油储集层微观孔喉分类与分级评价[J].石油勘探与开发,2018(03).
吴松涛,朱如凯,李勋,金旭,杨智,毛治国.致密储层孔隙结构表征技术有效性评价与应用[J].地学前缘,2018(02).
俞雨溪,罗晓容,雷裕红,程明,王香增,张丽霞,姜呈馥,尹锦涛,张立宽.陆相页岩孔隙结构特征研究——以鄂尔多斯盆地延长组页岩为例[J].天然气地球科学,2016(04).
孙亮,王晓琦,金旭,李建明,吴松涛.微纳米孔隙空间三维表征与连通性定量分析[J].石油勘探与开发,2016(03).
杨潇,姜呈馥,孙兵华,宋海强.砂质纹层的发育特征及对页岩储层物性的影响——以鄂尔多斯盆地南部中生界延长组为例[J].延安大学学报(自然科学版),2015(02).
张顺,陈世悦,鄢继华,谭明友,张云银,龚文磊,王光增.东营凹陷西部沙三下亚段——沙四上亚段泥页岩岩相及储层特征[J].天然气地球科学,2015(02).
姜在兴,梁超,吴靖,张建国,张文昭,王永诗,刘惠民,陈祥.含油气细粒沉积岩研究的几个问题[J].石油学报,2013(06).
邹才能,杨智,崔景伟,朱如凯,侯连华,陶士振,袁选俊,吴松涛,林森虎,王岚,白斌,姚泾利.页岩油形成机制、地质特征及发展对策[J].石油勘探与开发,2013(01).
王冠民.济阳坳陷古近系页岩的纹层组合及成因分类[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2012(03).
0
浏览量
277
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621