基于Pearson卡方检验算法评价指标优选的波密-墨脱地区泥石流易发性评价

李群; 徐红剑; 杨金; 王林康; 孙靖宜; 章广成

doi:10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.tb20240091

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

基于Pearson卡方检验算法评价指标优选的波密-墨脱地区泥石流易发性评价

工程地质与地质灾害 | 更新时间：2026-11-05

- 基于Pearson卡方检验算法评价指标优选的波密-墨脱地区泥石流易发性评价
- 基于Pearson卡方检验算法评价指标优选的波密-墨脱地区泥石流易发性评价
- 地质科技通报 2025年44卷第4期页码：316-329
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 中交第二公路勘察设计研究院有限公司
  2. 中国地质大学(武汉)工程学院
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  扎墨公路沿线地质灾害发育规律与工程影响评价研究
- DOI：10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.tb20240091
  中图分类号： P642.23
- 网络首发：2024-06-18，
  
  纸质出版：2025
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
李群, 徐红剑, 杨金, 等. 基于Pearson卡方检验算法评价指标优选的波密-墨脱地区泥石流易发性评价[J]. 地质科技通报, 2025,44(4):316-329.

李群, 徐红剑, 杨金, et al. 基于Pearson卡方检验算法评价指标优选的波密-墨脱地区泥石流易发性评价[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology, 2025, 44(4): 316-329.
李群, 徐红剑, 杨金, 等. 基于Pearson卡方检验算法评价指标优选的波密-墨脱地区泥石流易发性评价[J]. 地质科技通报, 2025,44(4):316-329. DOI： 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.tb20240091.

李群, 徐红剑, 杨金, et al. 基于Pearson卡方检验算法评价指标优选的波密-墨脱地区泥石流易发性评价[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology, 2025, 44(4): 316-329. DOI： 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.tb20240091.

摘要

西藏地区地貌单元复杂、地质构造活跃，为该地区泥石流提供了良好的孕育环境，也对人类生命财产构成了极大威胁，开展泥石流易发性评价可为地区防灾减灾明确重点区域。以西藏自治区波密县-墨脱县为研究区域，利用Pearson卡方检验算法优选出高程、坡度、地层岩性、降雨量等12个对泥石流影响较高的因素作为评价指标，以研究区282个泥石流点和非泥石流点为样本数据库，基于ArcGIS平台利用信息量法和机器学习方法建立了4种易发性评价模型，并引入接受者操作特性（ROC）曲线和AUC(ROC曲线下方的积分面积)指标对泥石流易发性精度进行评估，得到了该地区的泥石流易发性评价分区。研究表明：（1）考虑不同维度泥石流类型主控因素不同，采用纬度和气温相融合的归一化系数作为泥石流易发性评价指标，在一定程度上消除了低海拔地区泥石流对温度的过度响应。（2）气温、距水系距离、距道路距离、地层岩性、高程是研究区泥石流发生的主控因素；植被覆盖率、地形湿度、坡度等因素也发挥着重要作用。（3）考虑泥石流灾害点和影响因子分级属性关系，对影响因子各分级属性赋分，作为输入特征进行训练，机器学习模型预测效果较好，平均AUC值为0.980，整体优于传统的信息量模型。（4）SVM模型的AUC值高达0.987，高易发区频率比率（FR）值为41.13且预测面积占比最小，具有在大尺度区域内进行高精度预测的能力。

Abstract

Complex geomorphic units and active geological structures provide favorable conditions for debris flow in Tibet

which poses a great threats to human life and property. ObjectiveThe evaluation of debris flow susceptibility can identify key areas for disaster reduction and prevention in this region. MethodsTaking Bomi and Motuo Counties of Tibet Autonomous Region as the study area

12 factors with high influence on debris flow

including elevation

slope

stratigraphic lithology and rainfall

were selected by Pearson Chi-square test algorithm as evaluation indexes. Data collected from 282 sits with and without debris flows in the study area were taken as the sample database. Based on ArcGIS platform

four susceptibility evaluation models were established by using Information Value Method and Machine Learning Method. The ROC curve and AUC index were introduced to evaluate the accuracy of debris flow susceptibility obtained from the proposed methods. ResultsA debris flow susceptibility map for the study area was obtained. ConclusionThe results indicate that: (1) Considering different types of debris flows in different dimensions and controlling factors

the normalization coefficients of latitude and temperature are used as the evaluation index of debris flow susceptibility

which can eliminate the excessive responses of debris flow to temperature in low altitude areas to a certain extent. (2) Air temperature

distance from water system

distance from road

formation lithology and elevation are the main factors of debris flow occurrence in the study area; Factors such as vegetation coverage

terrain humidity

and slope also play an important role. (3) Considering the relationship between the disaster points of debris flows and the classification attributes of the impact factors

the classification attributes of the impact factors are assigned scores and trained as input features. The machine learning model performs well

and its average AUC is 0.980

which was better than the traditional information models. (4) The AUC of SVM model is as high as 0.987

and the FR value of the highly prone region is 41.13. The prediction area of high-risk regions takes up the smallest proportion

demonstrating superior high-precision prediction capability in large-scale regions.

关键词

Keywords

references

利永康.电絮凝法处理垃圾渗滤液的实验研究[J].化学工程与装备,2025(03).

吴雅睿,娄春辉,侯龙君,刘峰.基于信息量与机器学习耦合模型的滑坡易发性评价对比分析[J].西安科技大学学报,2024(06).

陈航,刘惠军,王韬,孙悦.基于频率比-深度神经网络耦合模型的滑坡易发性评价——以盐源县为例[J].水文地质工程地质,2024(05).

邓日朗,张庆华,刘伟,陈凌伟,谭建辉,高泽茂,郑先昌.基于改进两步法采样策略和卷积神经网络的崩塌易发性评价[J].地质科技通报,2024(02).

饶姗姗,冷小鹏.基于RSIV-RF模型的凉山州泥石流易发性评价[J].地质科技通报,2024(01).

王向前,丁明涛,何雨枫.基于RF模型的甘孜藏族自治州乡城县泥石流易发性评价[J].灾害学,2023(03).

邬礼扬,殷坤龙,曾韬睿,刘书豪,刘真意.不同栅格尺寸下输电线路地质灾害易发性评价[J].地质科技通报,2024(01).

温鑫,范宣梅,陈兰,刘世康.基于信息量模型的地质灾害易发性评价:以川东南古蔺县为例[J].地质科技通报,2022(02).

陈前,晏鄂川,黄少平,王茜.基于样本与因子优化的黄冈南部地区地质灾害易发性评价[J].地质科技通报,2020(02).

李益敏,李驭豪,赵志芳.基于确定性系数模型的泸水市泥石流易发性评价[J].水土保持研究,2019(04).

王昌明,黄健,李桥,张帅.基于信息量模型与Logistic回归模型耦合的山西吕梁市地质灾害易发性评价研究[J].水利水电技术,2019(03).

陈朝亮,彭树宏,钱静,胡增运,张文君,徐锴滨.基于AHP-Logistic熵权模型的西南浅丘区地质灾害分布特征研究——以内江市为例[J].长江科学院院报,2020(02).

刘永垚,第宝锋,詹宇,Constantine A.Stamatopoulos.基于随机森林模型的泥石流易发性评价——以汶川地震重灾区为例[J].山地学报,2018(05).

张以晨,秦胜伍,翟健健,李广杰,彭帅英,刘绪,陈骏骏.基于信息量的长白山地区泥石流易发性评价[J].水文地质工程地质,2018(02).

邹强,唐建喜,李淑松,范建容.基于水文响应单元的泥石流灾害易发性分区方法[J].山地学报,2017(04).

胡凯衡,崔鹏,韩用顺,游勇.基于聚类和最大似然法的汶川灾区泥石流滑坡易发性评价[J].中国水土保持科学,2012(01).

邓祖容.工科院校图书馆社会科学图书目标管理初探[J].图书情报知识,1986(02).

Ling Xiao,Zhu Yueqin,Ming Dongping,Chen Yangyang,Zhang Liang,Du Tongyao.Feature Engineering of Geohazard Susceptibility Analysis Based on the Random Forest Algorithm: Taking Tianshui City, Gansu Province, as an Example[J].Remote Sensing,2022.

Qin Shengwu,Qiao Shuangshuang,Yao Jingyu,Zhang Lingshuai,Liu Xiaowei,Guo Xu,Chen Yang,Sun Jingbo.Establishing a GIS-based evaluation method considering spatial heterogeneity for debris flow susceptibility mapping at the regional scale[J].Natural Hazards,2022.

Zhu Zhifu,Gan Shu,Yuan Xiping,Zhang Jianming.Landslide Susceptibility Mapping with Integrated SBAS-InSAR Technique: A Case Study of Dongchuan District, Yunnan (China).[J].Sensors (Basel, Switzerland),2022.

Pham Binh Thai,Van Dao Dong,Acharya Tri Dev,Van Phong Tran,Costache Romulus,Van Le Hiep,Nguyen Hanh Bich Thi,Prakash Indra.Performance assessment of artificial neural network using chi-square and backward elimination feature selection methods for landslide susceptibility analysis[J].Environmental Earth Sciences,2021.

Ke Xiong,Basanta Raj Adhikari,Constantine A. Stamatopoulos,Yu Zhan,Shaolin Wu,Zhongtao Dong,Baofeng Di.Comparison of Different Machine Learning Methods for Debris Flow Susceptibility Mapping: A Case Study in the Sichuan Province, China[J].Remote Sensing,2020.

Saier Wu,Jian Chen,Wendy Zhou,Javed Iqbal,Leihua Yao.A modified Logit model for assessment and validation of debris-flow susceptibility[J].Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment,2019(6).

Wei Chen,Hamid Reza Pourghasemi,Aiding Kornejady,Ning Zhang.Landslide spatial modeling: Introducing new ensembles of ANN, MaxEnt, and SVM machine learning techniques[J].Geoderma,2017.

Laura Maria Stancanelli,David Johnny Peres,Antonino Cancelliere,Enrico Foti.A combined triggering-propagation modeling approach for the assessment of rainfall induced debris flow susceptibility[J].Journal of Hydrology,2017.

original> .Landslide susceptibility mapping based on landslide history and analytic hierarchy process (AHP)[J].Natural Hazards,2016.

Dieu Tien Bui,Tran Anh Tuan,Klempe, Harald,Pradhan, Biswajeet,Revhaug, Inge.Spatial prediction models for shallow landslide hazards: a comparative assessment of the efficacy of support vector machines, artificial neural networks, kernel logistic regression, and logistic model tree[J].Landslides,2016.

Debris flow susceptibility mapping in a portion of the Andes and Preandes of San Juan, Argentina using frequency ratio and logistic regression models[J].Earth Science Research Journal,2013.

Wenbo Xu,Wenjuan Yu,Shaocai Jing,Guoping Zhang,Jianxi Huang.Debris flow susceptibility assessment by GIS and information value model in a large-scale region, Sichuan Province (China)[J].Natural Hazards,2013.

Zhi Quan Yang,Ying Yan Zhu,D.H.Steve Zou,Li Ping Liao.Activity Degree Evaluation of Glacial Debris Flow along International Karakorum Highway (KKH) Based on Fuzzy Theory[J].Advanced Materials Research,2011.

Pradhan Biswajeet,Lee Saro.Delineation of landslide hazard areas on Penang Island, Malaysia, by using frequency ratio, logistic regression, and artificial neural network models[J].Environmental Earth Sciences,2010.

Leonardo Cascini.Applicability of landslide susceptibility and hazard zoning at different scales[J].Engineering Geology,2008.

Lee Saro,Min Kyungduck.Statistical analysis of landslide susceptibility at Yongin, Korea[J].Environmental Geology,2001.

张瀛.波密至扎木110kV输电线路工程沿线泥石流灾害分析与防治[D].兰州大学,2021(09).

李泽群.基于BP人工神经网络和GIS的湖南省鼎城区滑坡易发性评价[D].河北地质大学,2020(06).

李翔.雅鲁藏布江墨脱河段大型滑坡发育与新构造地貌演化关联性研究[D].成都理工大学,2019(02).

陈礼然.波密杂岩锆石U-Pb年代学、地球化学和Hf同位素组成对拉萨地体前寒武纪演化的约束[D].中国地质大学,2019(02).

田海.西藏波密地区冰川泥石流的成因机制分析[D].成都理工大学,2018(06).

浏览量

1433

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

河南省登封南部地区滑坡灾害早期识别与易发性评价

基于Kruskal-Wallis检验和降维技术评价指标优化的海北州热融地质灾害易发性评价

基于改进两步法采样策略和卷积神经网络的崩塌易发性评价

基于RSIV-RF模型的凉山州泥石流易发性评价

不同栅格尺寸下输电线路地质灾害易发性评价