1. 成都理工大学地质灾害防治与地质环境保护国家重点实验室
2. 四川省自然资源厅
网络首发:2023-12-17,
纸质出版:2025
移动端阅览
宋静园, 刘洋, 董秀军, 等. “9·5”泸定地震人口密集区域地震诱发滑坡空间分布规律[J]. 地质科技通报, 2025,44(5):202-214.
宋静园, 刘洋, 董秀军, et al. “9·5”泸定地震人口密集区域地震诱发滑坡空间分布规律[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology, 2025, 44(5): 202-214.
宋静园, 刘洋, 董秀军, 等. “9·5”泸定地震人口密集区域地震诱发滑坡空间分布规律[J]. 地质科技通报, 2025,44(5):202-214. DOI: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.tb20230619.
宋静园, 刘洋, 董秀军, et al. “9·5”泸定地震人口密集区域地震诱发滑坡空间分布规律[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology, 2025, 44(5): 202-214. DOI: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.tb20230619.
研究地震诱发滑坡的空间分布规律,不仅能为灾区地质灾害隐患排查、灾情评估等提供重要依据,同时对后期灾后重建、灾后安置选址以及地质灾害防治等工作具有重要意义。以2022年9月5日四川甘孜泸定县Ms 6.8级地震为例,首先基于获取得到的震后0.2 m分辨率光学影像(digital orthophoto map,简称DOM)和0.5 m分辨率的数字高程模型(digital elevation matrix,简称DEM),采用人工目视三维遥感解译地震诱发滑坡,再结合野外调查修正,确定最终地震诱发滑坡数量,并在此基础上分析地震诱发滑坡分布与地形地貌、地质构造、地震因子等地质背景的关系。结果表明:(1)此次泸定地震事件在约680 km
2
的研究区内引发了9 248处滑坡,且以中、小型滑坡为主,滑坡面积密度最高集中在鲜水河断裂、大渡河断裂以及锦屏山断裂3条断裂交汇处;滑坡总面积约45.57 km
2
,平均滑坡面积可达4 941 m
2
。(2)本次地震滑坡分布主要受地面峰值加速度PGA以及断裂构造影响,多分布在PGA> 0.6 g(g为重力加速度),距发震断裂两侧1 km范围内;此外滑坡的发育还与距水系及道路距离呈负相关;局部受地形因素影响滑坡主要发育在高程1 200~2 400 m、坡度30°~60°、坡向E及SE向区域,且地层岩性多为硬岩。(3)此次泸定地震的滑坡数量及面积与震级关系也遵循指数分布;同时由于此次解译基础数据精度较高,解译得到的地震滑坡数量相比于其他文献而言更多,最小面积更小,总面积更大。本研究成果已应用于泸定地震灾区的灾后恢复重建工作,为提高抗灾能力和降低地震风险提供了科学依据。
ObjectiveThe spatial distribution analysis of earthquake-induced landslides offers critical insights for identifying potential geological disasters in affected regions
which is fundamental for informing post-disaster reconstruction planning
relocation strategies
site selection processes
and the development of effective geological disaster mitigation measures. MethodsTaking the earthquake that struck Luding County
Ganzi
Sichuan Province
on September 5
2022
as a case study
earthquake-induced landslides were initially identified using artificial visual 3D remote sensing data. This analysis was based on an optical image (DOM) with a resolution of 0.2 meter and a digital elevation model (DEM) with a resolution of 0.5 meter
both acquired post-earthquake. Field investigations and subsequent corrections were performed to validate and finalize the landslide inventory. Subsequently
the relationships between the distribution of earthquake-induced landslides and various geological factors
including topography
geological structures
and earthquake parameters
were systematically analyzed. Results①The Luding earthquake triggered 9248 landslides
covering an area of approximately 680 km2
with the majority classified as small- to medium-sized. The highest landslide density was observed at the tectonic intersection of the Xianshuihe fault
Daduhe fault
and Jinping mountain fault. The cumulative landslide area reached approximately 45.57 km2
with an average landslide area of 4941 m2. ② The spatial distribution of landslide in the earthquake-affected region is predominantly controlled by PGA and fault structures
with the majority of landslides concentrated in areas where PGA exceeds 0.6 g and within 1 km on either side of the seismogenic fault. Furthermore
landslide occurrence exhibits a negative correlation with proximity to water systems and roads. At a local scale
topographic factors significantly influence landslide distribution
with the highest frequency observed at elevations ranging from 1200 to 2400 m
on slopes inclined between 30° and 60°
and predominantly facing east or southeast. Additionally
landslides are more prevalent in areas underlain by hard rock strata. ③ The number and area of landslides exhibit an exponential relationship with the magnitude of the Luding earthquake. Leveraging high-precision data
our analysis identified a significantly higher number of earthquake-induced landslides compared to previous studies
with a reduced minimum landslide area and an increased total affected area. ConclusionThe findings of this study have been implemented to support post-disaster recovery and reconstruction efforts in the Luding earthquake-affected region
providing a scientific basis for enhancing resilience and reducing future earthquake risks.
Xiao Zikang,Xu Chong,Huang Yuandong,He Xiangli,Shao Xiaoyi,Chen Zhaoning,Xie Chenchen,Li Tao,Xu Xiwei.Analysis of spatial distribution of landslides triggered by the Ms 6.8 Luding earthquake in China on September 5, 2022[J].Geoenvironmental Disasters,2023(1).
Huang Yuandong,Xie Chenchen,Li Tao,Xu Chong,He Xiangli,Shao Xiaoyi,Xu Xiwei,Zhan Tao,Chen Zhaoning.An open-accessed inventory of landslides triggered by the MS 6.8 Luding earthquake, China on September 5, 2022[J].Earthquake Research Advances,2023.
Zhao Bo,Li Weile,Su Lijun,Wang Yunsheng,Wu Haochen.Insights into the Landslides Triggered by the 2022 Lushan Ms 6.1 Earthquake: Spatial Distribution and Controls[J].Remote Sensing,2022.
Zou Yu,Qi Shengwen,Guo Songfeng,Zheng Bowen,Zhan Zhifa,He Naiwu,Huang Xiaolin,Hou Xiaokun,Liu Haiyang.Factors controlling the spatial distribution of coseismic landslides triggered by the Mw 6.1 Ludian earthquake in China[J].Engineering Geology,2022.
Sixiang Ling,Chunwei Sun,Xiaoning Li,Yong Ren,Jianxiang Xu,Tao Huang.Characterizing the distribution pattern and geologic and geomorphic controls on earthquake-triggered landslide occurrence during the 2017 M s 7.0 Jiuzhaigou earthquake, Sichuan, China[J].Landslides,2020.
Tanyas Hakan,Lombardo Luigi.Completeness Index for Earthquake-Induced Landslide Inventories[J].Engineering Geology,2020.
Wen Liu,Fumio Yamazaki,Yoshihisa Maruyama.Detection of Earthquake-Induced Landslides during the 2018 Kumamoto Earthquake Using Multitemporal Airborne Lidar Data[J].Remote Sensing,2019.
Habibah Hanan Mat Yusoff,Khamarrul Azahari Razak,Florence Yuen,Afifi Harun,Jasmi Talib,Zakaria Mohamad,Zamri Ramli,Razain Abd Razab.Mapping of post-event earthquake induced landslides in Sg. Mesilou using LiDAR[J].IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science,2016.
Chong Xu,Xiwei Xu,J. Bruce H. Shyu.Database and spatial distribution of landslides triggered by the Lushan, China Mw 6.6 earthquake of 20 April 2013[J].Geomorphology,2015.
0
浏览量
40
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621