1.贵州省农业科学院果树科学研究所,贵阳 550006
2.贵州省农业科学院亚热带作物研究所,贵阳 550006
刘颖,E-mail:ly15761636417@163.com
毛永亚,E-mail:463033952@qq.com
收稿:2025-06-16,
纸质出版:2026-05-25
移动端阅览
刘颖,马玉华,周俊良,等.凤梨废弃植株覆盖对火龙果根际土壤理化性质及微生物群落的影响[J].华中农业大学学报,2026,45(3):235‐245.
LIU Ying,MA Yuhua,ZHOU Junliang,et al.Effects of mulching pineapple residue on physicochemical properties and microbial community in rhizosphere soil of pitaya[J].Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University,2026,45(03):235-245.
刘颖,马玉华,周俊良,等.凤梨废弃植株覆盖对火龙果根际土壤理化性质及微生物群落的影响[J].华中农业大学学报,2026,45(3):235‐245. DOI: 10.13300/j.cnki.hnlkxb.2026.03.021.
LIU Ying,MA Yuhua,ZHOU Junliang,et al.Effects of mulching pineapple residue on physicochemical properties and microbial community in rhizosphere soil of pitaya[J].Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University,2026,45(03):235-245. DOI: 10.13300/j.cnki.hnlkxb.2026.03.021.
为探究覆盖处理对火龙果根际土壤及果实品质的影响,以‘黔蜜龙’火龙果为试验材料,利用火龙果果园套种产生的凤梨废弃植株进行覆盖处理(SM),不覆盖为对照(CK),覆盖1 a后采集土壤样品及果实样品,分析凤梨废弃植株覆盖处理对火龙果根际土壤的理化性质、酶活性、土壤微生物群落结构多样性及火龙果果实品质的影响。结果显示,与对照相比,覆盖后火龙果根际土壤有机质含量增加了119.26%,显著提高了土壤养分含量,硝酸还原酶活性、脲酶活性、纤维素酶活性和蔗糖酶活性分别显著提高了107.37%、13.70%、16.37%和25.74%,火龙果单果质量、可溶性固形物含量、可溶性糖含量和可滴定酸含量分别提升22.10%、5.80%、3.25%和11.76%;覆盖显著提高细菌变形菌门、酸杆菌门以及真菌子囊菌门和担子菌门的相对丰度,较对照分别提高了20.35%、15.81%、12.08%和58.58%,细菌绿弯菌门和放线菌门的相对丰度较对照显著降低了16.13%和12.97%;Alpha多样性分析结果显示,覆盖对土壤细菌群落的影响不显著;真菌群落的Shannon指数、Simpson指数、Invsimpson指数和Pielou指数较对照显著提高了37.72%、15.66%、61.42%和60.00%;相关性分析及结构方程模型显示,土壤碱解氮是影响火龙果果实可溶性固形物和可滴定酸含量的主效因子,其次是土壤脲酶活性。以上结果表明,凤梨废弃植株覆盖措施可显著增加土壤有机质含量,利于土壤细菌群落和真菌群落繁殖,调节土壤微生物群落结构多样性和丰度,正向提高土壤碱解氮含量和脲酶活性,提升火龙果果实产量及内在品质。
The ‘Qianmilong’ pitaya fruit variety was used to study the factors affecting the effects of mulching on the rhizosphere soil and the quality of pitaya fruit. Pineapple residue generated from intercropping in pitaya orchards was used for mulching treatment (SM), with no mulching as the control (CK). Samples of soil and fruit were collected after one year of coverage to analyze the effects of mulching pineapple residue on the physicochemical properties, activity of enzyme, structural diversity of microbial community in rhizosphere soil, and the quality of pitaya fruit. The results showed that,compared to the control,mulching increased soil organic matter content by 119.26% and significantly enhanced overall soil nutrient levels .The activities of nitrate reductase,urease,cellulase,and sucrase significantly increased by 107.37%、13.70%、16.37% and 25.74%,respectively.Regarding fruit quality,single fruit weight,total soluble solids,soluble sugar,and titratable acid increased by 22.10%,5.80%,3.25%,and 11.76%,respectively.Mulching significantly increased the relative abundances of bacterial phyla Proteobacteria and Acidobacteriota and fungal phyla Ascomycota and Basidiomycota by 20.35%,15.81%,12.08% and 58.58%, respectively.The relative abundances of bacterial Chloroflexi and Actinobacteriota were significantly reduced by 16.13% and 12.97%,respectively. The results of Alpha diversity analysis showed that mulching had no significant effect on the bacterial communities in soil. The Shannon index, Simpson index, Invasimpson index, and Pielou index of fungal communities in SM significantly increased by 37.72%, 15.66%, 61.42%, and 60.00% compared to that in CK. The results of correlation analysis and structural equation modeling showed that the alkali-hydrolyzable nitrogen in soil was the primary factor driving the content of total soluble solids and titratable acid in pitaya fruit, followed by the activity of urease in soil. It is indicated that the measure of mulching pineapple residue can significantly increase the content of organic matter in soil, promote the proliferation of bacterial and fungal communities in soil, regulate the structural diversity and abundance of microbial community in soil, positively improve the content of alkali-hydrolyzable nitrogen and the activity of urease in soil, and enhance the yield and intrinsic quality of pitaya fruit.
尹晓宁,刘兴禄,董铁,等.苹果园不同覆盖材料对土壤与近地微域环境及树体生长发育的影响[J].中国生态农业学报,2018,26(1):83-95.YIN X N,LIU X L,DONG T,et al.Effects of different mulching materials on soil and near-surface environment and of apple orchard tree growth[J].Chinese journal of eco-agriculture,2018,26(1):83-95 (in Chinese with English abstract) .
刘文球,韩玉国,王晓学,等.不同地面覆盖方式对晋西地区苹果园土壤水分及果树生长的影响[J].中国农业大学学报,2025,30(4):106-118. LIU W Q,HAN Y G,WANG X X,et al.Effect of different mulching measures on soil moisture and apple fruit trees growth in the Loess Plateau of western Shanxi Province,China[J].Journal of China Agricultural University,2025,30(4):106-118 (in Chinese with English abstract) .
成文竞,张琴,佘为为,等.不同覆盖方式对桃园土壤性状及果实产量品质的影响[J].中国南方果树,2024,53(5):124-129. CHENG W J,ZHANG Q,SHE W W,et al.Effects of different mulching methods on soil properties and fruit yield and quality in peach orchard[J].South China fruits,2024,53(5):124-129 (in Chinese with English abstract) .
钟昌宏,赵鹏飞,周义良,等.不同覆盖基质对火龙果果园土壤性质和作物生长的影响[J].中国土壤与肥料,2024(12):103- 109. ZHONG C H,ZHAO P F,ZHOU Y L,et al.Effects of different covering substrates on soil properties and crop growth in dragon fruit orchards[J].Soil and fertilizer sciences in China,2024(12):103-109 (in Chinese with English abstract) .
田玉莉,吴小苹,陈欣佛,等.黄土高原果园不同覆盖模式对土壤酶活性的影响[J].草地学报,2022,30(10):2581-2589. TIAN Y L,WU X P,CHEN X F,et al.Effect of diversity mulching model on soil enzyme activities in the Loess Plateau orchard[J].Acta agrestia sinica,2022,30(10):2581-2589 (in Chinese with English abstract) .
刘子涵,黄方园,黎景来,等.覆盖模式对旱作农田土壤微生物多样性及群落结构的影响[J].生态学报,2021,41(7):2750-2760. LIU Z H,HUANG F Y,LI J L,et al.Effects of farmland mulching patterns on soil microbial diversity and community structure in dryland[J].Acta ecologica sinica,2021,41(7):2750-2760 (in Chinese with English abstract) .
赵强,章洁琼,汪灿,等.不同间作模式下糯高粱根际土壤特性及产量变化[J].南方农业学报,2022,53(8):2122-2132. ZHAO Q,ZHANG J Q,WANG C,et al.Rhizosphere soil characteristics and yield changes of waxy sorghum under different intercropping patterns[J].Journal of southern agriculture,2022,53(8):2122-2132 (in Chinese with English abstract) .
鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M].3版.北京:中国农业出版社,2000. BAO S D.Soil and agricultural chemistry analysis[M].3rd ed.Beijing:China Agriculture Press,2000 (in Chinese) .
关松荫.土壤酶及其研究法[M].北京:农业出版社,1986. GUAN S Y.Soil enzyme and its research method[M].Beijing:Agriculture Press,1986 (in Chinese) .
高俊凤.植物生理学实验指导[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2006:144-199. GAO J F.Experimental guidance for plant physiology[M].Beijing:Higher Education Press,2006:144-199 (in Chinese) .
杨勤,谷文超,周浓,等.苯酚-硫酸法与蒽酮-硫酸法测定地参多糖的比较研究[J].食品科技,2020,45(1):343-350. YANG Q,GU W C,ZHOU N,et al.Comparison of phenol-sulfuric acid and anthrone-sulfuric methods for determination of polysaccharide in Lycopus lucidus Tilrcz.var. hirtus Regel[J].Food science and technology,2020,45(1):343-350 (in Chinese with English abstract) .
朱瑜,周信雁,魏宇飞,等.嫁接对番茄植株根际微生物群落组成的影响[J].西南农业学报,2024,37(1):199-209. ZHU Y,ZHOU X Y,WEI Y F,et al.Effects of grafting on soil microbial community compositions in rhizospheres of tomatoes[J].Southwest China journal of agricultural sciences,2024,37(1):199-209 (in Chinese with English abstract) .
HOU Z G,MA X J,ZHAN M Q,et al.Effects of nano-selenium addition on the nitrogen cycle during composting:mechanistic regulation of denitrification and organic nitrogen metabolism[J/OL].Journal of environmental management,2025,391:126526[2025-06-16].https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.126526.
薛婷婷,程春颖,杨帆,等.葡萄园有机覆盖措施对土壤特性的影响研究进展[J].中国农业大学学报,2024,29(6):206-218.XUE T T,CHENG C Y,YANG F,et al.Effect of organic mulching practices on soil properties in vineyards:a review[J].Journal of China Agricultural University,2024,29(6):206-218 (in Chinese with English abstract) .
朱嘉雯,马蔚红,井涛,等.生物覆盖对果园土壤质量与热带果树生长发育影响的研究进展[J].贵州农业科学,2021,49(3):25-39.ZHU J W,MA W H,JING T,et al.Research progress on effect of biological mulching on soil quality in orchard,and growth and development of tropical fruit trees[J].Guizhou agricultural sciences,2021,49(3):25-39 (in Chinese with English abstract) .
王倩,安贵阳,李世芳,等.不同覆盖模式对旱地苹果园土壤养分、微生物和酶活性的影响[J].西北农业学报,2015,24(7):69-74.WANG Q,AN G Y,LI S F,et al.Soil nutrients,enzyme activities and microbes in non-irrigation apple orchard under different mulching managements[J].Acta agriculturae boreali occidentalis sinica,2015,24(7):69-74 (in Chinese with English abstract) .
孙萌,刘洋,李寒,等.有机物覆盖对核桃园土壤有机碳库及酶活性的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2018,24(1):270-278.SUN M,LIU Y,LI H,et al.Effects of organic mulching on soil organic carbon pool and soil enzyme activity in walnut orchard[J].Journal of plant nutrition and fertilizers,2018,24(1):270-278 (in Chinese with English abstract) .
温晓霞,殷瑞敬,高茂盛,等.不同覆盖模式下旱作苹果园土壤酶活性和微生物数量时空动态研究[J].西北农业学报,2011,20(11):82-88.WEN X X,YIN R J,GAO M S,et al.Spatiotemporal dynamics of soil enzyme activities and microbes in apple orchard soil under different mulching managements[J].Acta agriculturae boreali-occidentalis sinica,2011,20(11):82-88 (in Chinese with English abstract) .
白雪,周怀平,解文艳,等.不同类型地膜覆盖对玉米农田土壤酶活性的影响[J].农业资源与环境学报,2018,35(4):381-3 88.BAI X,ZHOU H P,XIE W Y,et al.Effects of different plastic film mulching on soil enzyme activity in maize farmland[J].Journal of agricultural resources and environment,2018,35(4):381-388 (in Chinese with English abstract) .
宋锦浩,郝婉怡,姜文婷,等.生草覆盖对枣园土壤理化性质的影响[J].中国农学通报,2024,40(33):102-110.SONG J H,HAO W Y,JIANG W T,et al.Effects of grass mulching on soil physicochemical properties of jujube orchard[J].Chinese agricultural science bulletin,2024,40(33):102-110 (in Chinese with English abstract) .
BURKE J A,LEWIS K L,RITCHIE G L,et al.Net positive soil water content following cover crops with no tillage in irrigated semi-arid cotton production[J/OL].Soil and tillage research,2021,208:104869[2025-06-16].https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2020.104869.
杨江山,常永义,李玟璇.不同覆盖方式对红地球葡萄园土壤物理性质的影响[J].中外葡萄与葡萄酒,2010(7):10-13.YANG J S,CHANG Y Y,LI W X.Effects of different mulching on physical properties of soil in Red Globe vineyard[J].Sino-overseas grapevine & wine,2010(7):10-13 (in Chinese with English abstract) .
孙鹏鹏,查倩,殷向静,等.葡萄园行间土壤覆盖方式对土壤理化性质及树体生长的影响[J].中国农学通报,2025,41(10):115-121.SUN P P,ZHA Q,YIN X J,et al.Effects of soil mulching modes in vineyard rows on soil physicochemical properties and tree growth[J].Chinese agricultural science bulletin,2025,41(10):115-121 (in Chinese with English abstract) .
庞群虎,王竞,孙权,等.生草覆盖对酿酒葡萄园土壤养分及浆果品质的影响[J].西南农 业学报,2019,32(8):1833-1838.PANG Q H,WANG J,SUN Q,et al.Effects of grass covering on soil nutrients and berry quality in winegrowers[J].Southwest China journal of agricultural sciences,2019,32(8):1833-1838 (in Chinese with English abstract) .
李晓莎,武宁,刘玲,等.不同秸秆还田和耕作方式对夏玉米农田土壤呼吸及微生物活性的影响[J].应用生态学报,2015,26(6):1765-1771.LI X S,WU N,LIU L,et al.Effects of different straw recycling and tillage methods on soil respiration and microbial activity[J].Chinese journal of applied ecology,2015,26(6):1765-1771 (in Chinese with English abstract) .
蔡晓布,钱成,张元,等.西藏中部地区退化土壤秸秆还田的微生物变化特征及其影响[J].应用生态学报,2004,15(3):463-468.CAI X B,QIAN C,ZHANG Y,et al.Microbial characteristics of straw-amended degraded soils in central Tibet and its effect on soil fertility[J].Chinese journal of applied ecology,2004,15(3):463-468 (in Chinese with English abstract) .
宋李霞,吴心瑶,宋稳锋,等.“旱三熟”制下不同覆盖处理对玉米根际土壤微生物多样性及群落结构的影响[J].土壤学报,2025,62(4):1210-1220.SONG L X,WU X Y,SONG W F,et al.Effects of different mulching treatments on soil microbial diversity and community structure in rhizosphere soil of maize under the“dryland triple intercropping”system[J].Acta pedologica sinica,2025,62(4):1210-1220 (in Chinese with English abstract) .
张翰林,白娜玲,郑宪清,等.秸秆还田与施肥方式对稻麦轮作土壤细菌和真菌群落结构与多样性的影响[J].中国生态农业学报(中英文),2021,29(3):531-539.ZHANG H L,BAI N L,ZHENG X Q,et al.Effects of straw returning and fertilization on soil bacterial and fungal community structures and diversities in rice-wheat rotation soil[J].Chinese journal of eco-agricult ure,2021,29(3):531-539 (in Chinese with English abstract) .
EBRAHIMI-ZARANDI M,ETESAMI H,GLICK B R.Fostering plant resilience to drought with Actinobacteria:unveiling perennial allies in drought stress tolerance[J/OL].Plant stress,2023,10:100242[2025-06-16].https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stress.2023.100242.
李昱龙,韩正敏.嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌在环保和农业生产上的应用[J].生物技术通报,2015,31(8):35-43.LI Y L,HAN Z M.The applicatioin of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia in environmental remediation and agriculture[J].Biotechnology bulletin,2015,31(8):35-43 (in Chinese with English abstract) .
LI Y,ZHANG X C,YANG N,et al.Long-term straw and plastic film mulching have divergent effects on maize rhizosphere enzyme activity and bacterial community structure[J/OL].Agriculture,ecosystems & environment,2024,364:108894[2025-06-16].https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2024.108894.
陈丹梅,陈晓明,梁永江,等.种植模式对土壤酶活性和真菌群落的影响[J].草业学报,2015,24(2):77-84.CHEN D M,CHEN X M,LIANG Y J,et al.Influence of cropping system on enzyme activities and fungal communities in soil[J].Acta prataculturae sinica,2015,24(2):77-84 (in Chinese with English abstract) .
孙文泰,董铁,刘兴禄,等.陇东旱塬地表覆盖方式对苹果生育后期叶片质量及根际土壤微环境的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究,2019,37(1):95-101.SUN W T,DONG T,LIU X L,et al.Effects of ground mulching on leaf quality in late apple growth stage and rhizosphere environment in the dryland of easter n Gansu Province[J].Agricultural research in the arid areas,2019,37(1):95-101 (in Chinese with English abstract) .
陈月星,温晓霞,孙瑜琳,等.地表覆盖对渭北旱作苹果园土壤细菌群落结构及多样性的影响[J].微生物学报,2015,55(7):892-904.CHEN Y X,WEN X X,SUN Y L,et al.Effect of ground mulch managements on soil bacterial community structure and diversity in the non-irrigated apple orchard in Weibei Loess Plateau[J].Acta microbiologica sinica,2015,55(7):892-904 (in Chinese with English abstract) .
李宏建,王宏,于年文,等.地面覆盖对苹果树体生长和果实品质的影响[J].果树学报,2019,36(3):296-307.LI H J,WANG H,YU N W,et al.Effects of mulching on the growth and fruit quality of apple trees[J].Journal of fruit science,2019,36(3):296-307 (in Chinese with English abstract) .
矣小鹏,廖永琴,韩天华,等.轮作对植烟土壤理化和生物学特性及烟叶化学成分影响的Meta分析[J].中国土壤与肥料,2025(2):236-248.YI X P,LIAO Y Q,HAN T H,et al. Mata analysis of effects of crop rotation on physicochemical and biological properties of tobacco-planting soil and chemical composition of tobacco leaves[J].Soil and fertilizer sciences in China,2025(2):236-248 (in Chinese with English abstract) .
0
浏览量
2
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621