1.武汉大学数学与统计学院,湖北 武汉,430072
2.武汉大学卫星导航定位技术研究中心,湖北 武汉,430079
3.武汉大学国家网络安全学院,湖北 武汉,430072
董传凯,硕士,研究方向为GNSS气象学。chuankaid@whu.edu.cn
张卫星,博士,副教授。zhangweixing89@whu.edu.cn
收稿:2023-02-20,
纸质出版:2025-05-05
移动端阅览
董传凯,余法承,张卫星,等.改进的GNSS-PWV三因子阈值降雨预报方法[J].武汉大学学报(信息科学版),2025,50(5):866-873.
DONG Chuankai,YU Facheng,ZHANG Weixing,et al.An Improved Rainfall Forecasting Method with GNSS-PWV Three Factor Threshold[J].Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University,2025,50(5):866-873.
董传凯,余法承,张卫星,等.改进的GNSS-PWV三因子阈值降雨预报方法[J].武汉大学学报(信息科学版),2025,50(5):866-873. DOI:10.13203/j.whugis20220798
DONG Chuankai,YU Facheng,ZHANG Weixing,et al.An Improved Rainfall Forecasting Method with GNSS-PWV Three Factor Threshold[J].Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University,2025,50(5):866-873. DOI:10.13203/j.whugis20220798
大气可降水量(precipitable water vapor
PWV)在研究大气水汽含量与降雨之间关系的研究中发挥着越来越重要的作用。基于全球导航卫星系统(global navigation satellite system
GNSS)-PWV的三因子(PWV、PWV变化量和PWV变化率)阈值的降雨预报方法已经在一些场景中取得了不错的效果,但该方法目前仍存在一些问题,包括部分场景下无法有效反映PWV的变化,预测因子的阈值确定不够合理。对传统方法进行了改进,以PWV为主要预测因子、PWV增量和PWV增率为辅助预测因子,并采用定量选取月阈值的方法进行降雨预报。基于SuomiNet网的实验结果显示,所提的改进方法能够取得92%以上的平均正确率和63%左右的平均误报率,与传统三因子算法相比,改进方法的降雨预报正确率更高,误报率更低,且命中率处于相同水平。可见,改进方法能够充分利用PWV的季节特征和实时信息捕捉PWV和降雨之间的关系,更有效地预测降雨。
Objectives
2
Precipitable water vapor (PWV) plays an increasingly significant role in the quantitative study of the potential meteorological factors that cause rainfall. The PWV-based three-factor (PWV
PWV change and rate of PWV change) threshold method for the rain forecast has been established
empirically proving its effectiveness in some scenarios. However
an apparent issue is that not fully using real-time information restricts performance. We propose an improved monthly threshold method to tackle this problem.
Methods
2
The basic idea is to refine the predictors. The three-factor monthly threshold method based on PWV
PWV increment and rate of PWV increment is used to realize the short-term rainfall forecast within 6 h
in which PWV is used as the main predictor
and PWV increment and PWV increase rate are used as secondary factors to assist in the prediction. We offer a quantitative standard for picking the threshold based on maximizing critical success index (CSI).The specific prediction steps are as follows: (1) The time series of the three predictors are extracted from the raw data using a 6 hours sliding window. Within each window
the PWV increment and the rate of PWV increment are computed. The window is then shifted by 30 minutes
and the process is repeated
resulting in sequences for both the PWV increment and the rate of PWV increment. (2) The monthly threshold is determined using data from 2015 to 2018
with the optimal PWV threshold for each month established based on the CSI. Once the threshold is determined
the CSI maximum principle is applied to simultaneously select the optimal thresholds for both the PWV increment and the rate of PWV increment. (3) The optimal thresholds
determined by the 2019 data
are subsequently applied to predict rainfall over the next 6 hours. Rainfall is predicted if the PWV exceeds the threshold at any given time. In cases where the PWV does not exceed the threshold
but both the PWV increment and the rate of PWV increment surpass their respective thresholds
rainfall is also predicted. If neither condition is met
no rainfall is predicted. The predicted rainfall is then compared with the observed rainfall to calculate key performance metrics
including the correct rate (CR)
false alarm rate (FAR)
and CSI. Additionally
it is argued that
unlike the probability of detection (POD)
the use of CR provides a more reasonable evaluation of the proportion of correctly predicted rainfall events.
Results
2
We apply our method to 11 different stations of SuomiNet. The CR of the improved method is above 89%
while the FAR is controlled below 73%. Among them the CR of the three stations P031
P047 and CN00 is about 95%
and the FAR is not higher than 65%. In general
the proposed method can predict more than 92% of rainfall on average
and the average FAR of each forecast is about 63%. Compared with the traditional three-factor algorithm
the average CR of the improved three-factor algorithm is increased by nearly 6%
the average FAR is reduced by more than 4%
and the average POD is at the same level.
Conclusions
2
Using PWV increment and the rate of PWV increment
the new predictor can better reflect the characteristics of the rising phase of PWV and keep updating synchronously with PWV. Compared with the traditional method
our algorithm can predict rainfall more effectively and has higher applicability.
国务院灾害调查组 . 河南郑州“7.20”特大暴雨灾害调查报告 [R]. 北京 : 中华人民共和国应急管理部 , 2022 .
Disaster Investigation Team of the State Council . Investigation Report on “7.20”Extraordinary Rainstorm Disaster in Zhengzhou, Henan [R]. Beijing : Ministry of Emergency Management of the People's Republic of China , 2022 .
BRETHERTON C S , PETERS M E , BACK L E . Relationships Between Water Vapor Path and Precipitation over the Tropical Oceans [J]. Journal of Climate , 2004 , 17 ( 7 ): 1517 - 1528 .
李国平 , 陈娇娜 , 郝丽萍 . 基于GPS-PWV的不同云系降水个例的综合分析 [J]. 武汉大学学报(信息科学版) , 2011 , 36 ( 4 ): 384 - 388 .
LI Guoping , CHEN Jiaona , HAO Liping . Case Study of the Rainfall Processes in Different Cloud Systems Based on GPS-PWV Data in Chengdu Plain [J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University , 2011 , 36 ( 4 ): 384 - 388 .
WANG J H , ZHANG L Y , DAI A G , et al . A Near-Global, 2-Hourly Data Set of Atmospheric Precipitable Water from Ground-Based GPS Measurements [J]. Journal of Geophysical Research (Atmospheres) , 2007 , 112 ( D11 ): D11107 .
陈永奇 , 刘焱雄 , 王晓亚 , 等 . 香港实时GPS水汽监测系统的若干关键技术 [J]. 测绘学报 , 2007 , 36 ( 1 ): 9 - 12 .
CHEN Yongqi , LIU Yanxiong , WANG Xiaoya , et al . GPS Real-Time Estimation of Precipitable Water Vapor: Hong Kong Experiences [J]. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica , 2007 , 36 ( 1 ): 9 - 12 .
施闯 , 周凌昊 , 范磊 , 等 . 利用北斗/GNSS观测数据分析 “21·7” 河南极端暴雨过程 [J]. 地球物理学报 , 2022 , 65 ( 1 ): 186 - 196 .
SHI Chuang , ZHOU Linghao , FAN Lei , et al . Analysis of “21·7” Extreme Rainstorm Process in Henan Province Using BeiDou/GNSS Observation [J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics , 2022 , 65 ( 1 ): 186 - 196 .
赵庆志 , 杜正 , 吴满意 , 等 . 利用多源数据构建PWV混合模型 [J]. 武汉大学学报(信息科学版) , 2022 , 47 ( 11 ): 1823 - 1831 .
ZHAO Qingzhi , DU Zheng , WU Manyi , et al . Establishment of PWV Fusion Model Using Multi-source Data [J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University , 2022 , 47 ( 11 ): 1823 - 1831 .
SECO A , RAMÍREZ F , SERNA E , et al . Rain Pattern Analysis and Forecast Model Based on GPS Estimated Atmospheric Water Vapor Content [J]. Atmospheric Environment , 2012 , 49 : 85 - 93 .
王贵文 , 王泽民 , 杨剑 . 地基GPS准实时反演三峡地区大气可降水量的研究 [J]. 武汉大学学报(信息科学版) , 2007 , 32 ( 9 ): 761 - 763 .
WANG Guiwen , WANG Zemin , YANG Jian . Ground-Based GPS Nearly Real-Time Inversion of Precipitable Water Vapor over Three Gorges Area [J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University , 2007 , 32 ( 9 ): 761 - 763 .
BEVIS M , BUSINGER S , CHISWELL S , et al . GPS Meteorology: Mapping Zenith Wet Delays Onto Precipitable Water [J]. Journal of Applied Meteorology , 1994 , 33 ( 3 ): 379 - 386 .
SAASTAMOINEN J . Atmospheric Correction for the Troposphere and Stratosphere in Radio Ranging Satellites [J]. The Use of Artificial Satellites for Geo-desy , 1972 , 15 : 247 - 251 .
LI X X , DICK G , LU C X , et al . Multi-GNSS Meteorology: Real-Time Retrieving of Atmospheric Water Vapor from BeiDou, Galileo, GLONASS, and GPS Observations [J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing , 2015 , 53 ( 12 ): 6385 - 6393 .
SHI J B , XU C Q , GUO J M , et al . Real-Time GPS Precise Point Positioning-Based Precipitable Water Vapor Estimation for Rainfall Monitoring and Forecasting [J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing , 2015 , 53 ( 6 ): 3452 - 3459 .
BENEVIDES P , CATALAO J , MIRANDA P M A . On the Inclusion of GPS Precipitable Water Vapour in the Nowcasting of Rainfall [J]. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences , 2015 , 15 ( 12 ): 2605 - 2616 .
YAO Y B , SHAN L L , ZHAO Q Z . Establishing a Method of Short-Term Rainfall Forecasting Based on GNSS-Derived PWV and Its Application [J]. Scientific Reports , 2017 , 7 ( 1 ): 12465 .
单路路 , 姚宜斌 , 赵庆志 , 等 . 基于GNSS PWV的短临降雨预测方法 [J]. 测绘地理信息 , 2019 , 44 ( 1 ): 22 - 26 .
SHAN Lulu , YAO Yibin , ZHAO Qingzhi , et al . A Short-Term Rainfall Forecasting Method Based on GNSS PWV Data [J]. Journal of Geomatics , 2019 , 44 ( 1 ): 22 - 26 .
MANANDHAR S , LEE Y H , MENG Y S . GPS-PWV Based Improved Long-Term Rainfall Prediction Algorithm for Tropical Regions [J]. Remote Sensing , 2019 , 11 ( 22 ): 2643 .
LI H B , WANG X M , WU S Q , et al . A New Method for Determining an Optimal Diurnal Threshold of GNSS Precipitable Water Vapor for Precipitation Forecasting [J]. Remote Sensing , 2021 , 13 ( 7 ): 1390 .
刘洋 , 赵庆志 , 姚顽强 . 联合GNSS PWV与气象参数的短临降雨预测 [C]// 第十一届中国卫星导航年会 , 中国北京 , 2020 .
LIU Yang , ZHAO Qingzhi , YAO Wanqiang . Combining GNSS-Derived PWV and meteorological Parameters for Short-Term Rainfall Forecasting [C]// The 11th China Satellite Navigation Conference , Beijing, China , 2020 .
刘洋 , 赵庆志 , 姚顽强 . 基于多隐层神经网络的GNSS PWV和气象数据的降雨预测研究 [J]. 测绘通报 , 2019 ( S1 ): 36 - 40 .
LIU Yang , ZHAO Qingzhi , YAO Wanqiang . Research on Rainfall Prediction Based on GNSS PWV and Meteorological Data with Multi-Hidden Neural Network [J]. Bulletin of Surveying and Mapping , 2019 ( S1 ): 36 - 40 .
BISWAS A N , LEE Y H , MANANDHAR S . Rainfall Forecasting Using GPS-Derived Atmospheric Gradient and Residual for Tropical Region [J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing , 2021 , 60 : 5802110 .
ZHAO Q Z , LIU Y , YAO W Q , et al . Hourly Rainfall Forecast Model Using Supervised Learning Algorithm [J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing , 2021 , 60 : 4100509 .
WARE R H , FULKER D W , STEIN S A , et al . SuomiNet: A Real-Time National GPS Network for Atmospheric Research and Education [J]. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society , 2000 , 81 ( 4 ): 677 - 694 .
DOSWELL I , FLUECK J A . Forecasting and Verifying in a Field Research Project: DOPLIGHT'87 [J]. Weather and Forecasting , 1989 , 4 ( 2 ): 97 - 109 .
Donaldson R J , Dyer R M , Kraus M J . Objective Evaluator of Techniques for Predicting Severe Weather Events [J]. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society , 1975 , 56 ( 7 ): 755 - 755 .
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621