
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1.华中农业大学资源与环境学院,武汉 430070
2.华中农业大学双水双绿研究院,武汉 430070
3.华中农业大学植物科学技术学院,武汉 430070
Received:27 August 2024,
Published:06 May 2025
移动端阅览
吴玲云,马天桥,张万洋,等.稻-鸭-虾模式下稻田土壤肥力变化特征[J].华中农业大学学报,2025,44(3):84‐90.
WU Lingyun,MA Tianqiao,ZHANG Wanyang,et al.Characteristics of changes in soil fertility in paddy field under model of rice-duck-crayfish[J].Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University,2025,44(03):84-90.
吴玲云,马天桥,张万洋,等.稻-鸭-虾模式下稻田土壤肥力变化特征[J].华中农业大学学报,2025,44(3):84‐90. DOI: 10.13300/j.cnki.hnlkxb.2025.03.010.
WU Lingyun,MA Tianqiao,ZHANG Wanyang,et al.Characteristics of changes in soil fertility in paddy field under model of rice-duck-crayfish[J].Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University,2025,44(03):84-90. DOI: 10.13300/j.cnki.hnlkxb.2025.03.010.
为探究稻-鸭-虾种养模式对稻田土壤肥力的影响,于2022—2023年采用田间试验和取样测试分析的方法,比较了稻-鸭-虾种养模式和水稻单作模式下水稻收获后的土壤物理、化学和生物学性质,结合模糊综合评价法和简单线性评分法,综合评价了2种模式下的土壤综合肥力。结果显示:稻-鸭-虾模式种养2 a后,土壤微生物量氮含量显著降低了53.27%;土壤有机质、全氮、速效钾以及微生物量碳含量呈上升趋势,土壤pH值、速效氮、速效磷、酸性磷酸酶和碱性磷酸酶含量呈下降趋势,但均无显著差异。与水稻单作模式相比,除了微生物量氮含量,其他指标均呈不同程度降低的趋势。从土壤肥力角度来看,稻-鸭-虾种养模式和水稻单作模式均无显著差异,但稻-鸭-虾种养模式稻田土壤肥力指数呈上升趋势,增幅为7.94%,而水稻单作模式土壤肥力指数降低,且2023年稻-鸭-虾种养模式土壤肥力指数比水稻单作模式高3.03%。结果表明,2 a种养条件下稻-鸭-虾模式稻田土壤肥力无显著变化。
The effects of the rice-duck-crayfish (CDR) model on soil fertility in paddy fields were studied by using field experiments and sampling tests from 2022 to 2023. The physical, chemical, and biological properties of soil after harvesting rice were compared between CDR and the rice monoculture (RM) model. The fertility of soil under two models was comprehensively evaluated by combining fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method and simple linear scoring method. The results showed that the content of microbial biomass nitrogen in soil significantly decreased by 53.27% after 2 years of CDR. The content of organic matter, total nitrogen, available potassium, and microbial biomass carbon in soil had an increasing trend, while the pH, the content of available nitrogen, available phosphorus, acid phosphatase, and alkaline phosphatase in soil had a decreasing trend, but there was no significant difference. All indexes except for the content of microbial biomass nitrogen had a decreasing trend to varying degrees compared with RM. There was no significant difference between CDR and RM in term of soil fertility. However, CDR had an upward trend in the soil fertility index of paddy fields, with an increase of 7.94%, while the soil fertility index of RM decreased, and the soil fertility index of CDR was 3.03% higher than that of RM in 2023. It is indicated that there was no significant change in soil fertility in paddy fields under two years of CDR.
TILMAN D,BALZER C,HILL J,et al.Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture[J].PNAS,2011,108(50):20260-20264.
陶玥玥,王海候,金梅娟,等.小麦产量与土壤养分对水生植物源有机氮替代率的响应[J].土壤学报,2019,56(1):156-164.TAO Y Y,WANG H H,JIN M J,et al.Response of wheat yield and soil nutrients to substitution of organic nitrogen with aquatic plant residue[J].Acta pedologica sinica,2019,56(1):156-164 (in Chinese with English abstract) .
陈晓云,孙文涛,于凤泉,等.稻蟹生态种养模式对稻田土壤肥力及生产效益的影响[J].土壤通报,2021,52(5):1165-1172.CHEN X Y,SUN W T,YU F Q,et al.Effect of rice-crab co-culture system on soil fertility and economic benefits[J].Chinese journal of soil science,2021,52(5):1165-1172 (in Chinese with English abstract) .
程建平,汪本福,张枝盛,等.湖北省稻田综合种养现状和技术创新与产业化发展思考[J].湖北农业科学,2017,56(22):4217-4220.CHENG J P,WANG B F,ZHANG Z S,et al.Present situation and technique innovation and industrialization of rice-aquaculture integrated cultivation in Hubei Province[J].Hubei agricultural sciences,2017,56(22):4217-4220 (in Chinese with English abstract) .
李昕升,王思明.江苏稻田养鱼的发展历史及生物多样性分析[J].华中农业大学学报(社会科学版),2014(1):139-144.LI X S,WANG S M.History of raising fish in paddy field in Jiangsu Province and analysis on the biodiversity[J].Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University (social sciences edition),2014(1):139-144 (in Chinese with English abstract) .
周兴兵,刘茂,张力,等.稻田养鱼模式下减量施氮 对杂交中稻产量和氮肥利用率的影响[J].中国稻米,2020,26(1):80-83.ZHOU X B,LIU M,ZHANG L,et al.Effects of reduced nitrogen application rate on grain yield and nitrogen use efficiency of mid-season hybrid rice under rice-fish system[J].China rice,2020,26(1):80-83 (in Chinese with English abstract) .
王晓莹,冯金侠,韦生宝,等.不同年限稻鸭共作对水体藻类群落结构的影响[J].农业环境科学学报,2021,40(9):1860-1868.WANG X Y,FENG J X,WEI S B,et al.Effects of different durations of rice-duck farming on the structure of algal communities in water[J].Journal of agro-environment science,2021,40(9):1860-1868 (in Chinese with English abstract) .
吕广动,黄璜,王忍,等.紫云英还田耦合稻鱼共生对双季水稻群体生长特性及产量的影响[J].生态学杂志,2020,39(12):4057-4067.LÜ G D,HUANG H,WANG R,et al.Effects of Chinese milk vetch returning to the field coupled with rice-fish symbiosis on population growth and yield of double cropping rice[J].Chinese journal of ecology,2020,39(12):4057-4067 (in Chinese with English abstract) .
王昂,王武,马旭洲,等.养蟹稻田水环境部分因子变化研究[J].湖北农业科学,2011,50(17):3514-3519.WANG A,WANG W,MA X Z,et al.Study on the changes of water environmental factors in rice-crab culture system[J].Hubei agricultural sciences,2011,50(17):3514-3519 (in Chinese with English abstract) .
LIU C H,HU N J,SONG W X,et al.Aquaculture feeds can be outlaws for eutrophication when hidden in rice fields: a case study in Qianjiang,China[J/OL].International journal of environmental research and public health,2019,16(22):4471[2024-08-27].https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16224471.
刘赫群,李嘉尧,成永旭,等.虾稻共作对稻田土壤线虫群落结构的影响[J].土壤,2017,49(6):1121-1125.LIU H Q,LI J Y,CHENG Y X,et al.Effects of rice-crayfish co-culture on nematode communities in rice paddy soil[J].Soils,2017,49(6):1121-1125 (in Chinese with English abstract) .
郭文啸,赵琦,朱元宏,等.蛙稻生态种养模式对土壤微生物特性的影响[J].江苏农业科学,2018,46(5):57-60. GUO W X,ZHAO Q,ZHU Y H,et al.Effect of frog and rice ecological farming model on soil microbial characteristics[J].Jiangsu agricultural sciences,2018,46(5):57-60 (in Chinese) .
FREY S D,KNORR M,PARRENT J L,et al.Chronic nitrogen enrichment affects the structure and function of the soil microbial community in temperate hardwood and pine forest[J].Forest ecology and management,2004,196:159-171.
关松荫.土壤酶及其研究法[M].北京:中国农业出版社,1986:74-339.GUAN S Y.Soil enzyme and its research methods[M].Beijing:Agricultural Press,1986:274-339 (in Chinese) .
于寒青,徐明岗,吕家珑,等.长期施肥下红壤地区土壤熟化肥力评价[J].应用生态学报,2010,21(7):1772-1778. YU H Q,XU M G,LÜ J L,et al.Variations of soil fertility level in red soil region under long-term fertilization[J].Chinese journal of applied ecology,2010,21(7):1772-1778 (in Chinese with English abstract) .
包玲凤,杨明英,尹兴盛,等.基于最小数据集的保山市植烟土壤质量评价与障碍诊断[J].西南农业学报,2023,36(3):612-622.BAO L F,YANG M Y,YIN X S,et al.Quality evaluation and obstacle diagnosis of soil pla nted with tobacco based on minimum data set in Baoshan city[J].Southwest China journal of agricultural sciences,2023,36(3):612-622 (in Chinese with English abstract) .
包耀贤,徐明岗,吕粉桃,等.长期施肥下土壤肥力变化的评价方法[J].中国农业科学,2012,45(20):4197-4204.BAO Y X,XU M G,LÜ F T,et al.Evaluation method on soil fertility under long-term fertilization[J].Scientia agricultura sinica,2012,45(20):4197-4204 (in Chinese with English abstract) .
GÜSEWELL S,GESSNER M O.N∶P ratios influence litter decomposition and colonization by fungi and bacteria in microcosms[J].Functional ecology,2009,23(1):211-219.
余经纬,黄巍,李玉成,等.稻田生态综合种养模式对土壤理化性质及腐殖质的影响[J].生物学杂志,2020,37(3):81-85.YU J W,HUANG W,LI Y C,et al.Effects of ecological comprehensive planting and breeding patterns on soil physical and chemical properties and humus in paddy fields[J].Journal of biology,2020,37(3):81-85 (in Chinese with English abstract) .
LI M J,LI R H,ZHANG J E et al.Effects of the integration of mixed-cropping and rice-duck co-culture on rice yield and soil nutrients in southern China[J].Journal of the science of food and agriculture,2020,100(1):277-286.
LI X Y,LI H Y,YANG L M,et al.Assessment of soil quality of croplands in the corn belt of Northeast China[J/OL].Sustainability,2018,10(1):248[2024-08-27].https://doi.org/10.3390/su10010248.
GRIFFITHS B S,PHILIPPOT L.Insights into the resistance and resilience of the soil microbial community[J].FEMS microbiology reviews,2013,37(2):112-129.
LI Z L,TIAN D S,WANG B X,et al.Microbes drive global soil nitrogen mineralization and availability[J].Global change biology,2019,25(3):1078-1088.
王宁,罗佳琳,赵亚慧,等.不同麦秸还田模式对稻田土壤微生物活性和微生物群落组成的影响[J].农业环境科学学报,2020,39(1):125-133.WANG N,LUO J L,ZHAO Y H,et al.Effects of different models of wheat straw return on paddy soil microbial activities and community compositions[J].Journal of agro-environment science,2020,39(1):125-133 (in Chinese with English abstract) .
邵继海,陈杰锋,胡婷.林氏念珠藻对酸化稻田水稻产量和土壤细菌群落结构与功能的影响[J].河南师范大学学报(自然科学版),2022,50(6):22-28.SHAO J H,CHEN J F,HU T.Effects of Nostoc linckia on rice grain yield and the structure and functions of bacterial community in acidified paddy soil[J].Journal of Henan Normal University (natural science edition),2022,50(6):22-28 (in Chinese with English abstract) .
余经纬.稻-虾-鸭生态复合种养模式下土壤质量及经济效益的提升效果研究[D].合肥:安徽大学,2019.YU J W.Study on the improvement of soil quality and economic benefit under rice-crayfish-duck ecological complex cultivation model[D].Hefei:Anhui University,2019 (in Chinese with English abstract) .
杨勇,胡小军,张洪程,等.稻渔(蟹)共作系统中水稻安全优质高效栽培的研究 Ⅴ.病虫草发生特点与无公害防治[J].江苏农 业科学,2004,32(6):21-26.YANG Y,HU X J,ZHANG H C,et al.Study on safe, high quality and efficient cultivation of rice in rice-fish (crab) co-cropping system V. occurrence characteristics and pollution-free control of diseases and pests[J].Jiangsu agricultural sciences,2004,32(6):21-26 (in Chinese) .
丁伟华,李娜娜,任伟征,等.传统稻鱼系统生产力提升对稻田水体环境的影响[J].中国生态农业学报,2013,21(3):308-314.DING W H,LI N N,REN W Z,et al.Effects of improved traditional rice-fish system productivity on field water environment[J].Chinese journal of eco-agriculture,2013,21(3):308-314 (in Chinese with English abstract) .
0
Views
2
下载量
1
CSCD
Publicity Resources
Related Articles
Related Author
Related Institution
京公网安备11010802024621