
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1.中国地震局地震研究所,湖北 武汉,430071
2.中国科学院精密测量科学与技术创新研究院,湖北 武汉,430077
3.中国科学院大学,北京,100049
4.武汉引力与固体潮国家野外科学观测研究站,湖北 武汉,430071
5.湖北省地震局,湖北 武汉,430071
Received:04 November 2024,
Published:05 February 2026
移动端阅览
李忠亚,胡敏章,张新林,等.RAI-g量子重力仪野外测试结果分析[J].武汉大学学报(信息科学版),2026,51(2):327-335.
LI Zhongya,HU Minzhang,ZHANG Xinlin,et al.Analysis of Field Test Results for the RAI-g Quantum Gravimeter[J].Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University,2026,51(2):327-335.
李忠亚,胡敏章,张新林,等.RAI-g量子重力仪野外测试结果分析[J].武汉大学学报(信息科学版),2026,51(2):327-335. DOI:10.13203/j.whugis20240156
LI Zhongya,HU Minzhang,ZHANG Xinlin,et al.Analysis of Field Test Results for the RAI-g Quantum Gravimeter[J].Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University,2026,51(2):327-335. DOI:10.13203/j.whugis20240156
量子重力测量是一种新型的观测技术,具有精度高、连续观测和无格值与漂移误差等特点,展现了在大地测量领域的巨大应用潜力。为评估量子重力仪在野外观测环境下的性能,采用RAI-g量子重力仪在武汉所、九峰和襄樊3个野外重力观测站的观测数据,处理得到重力值及其精度信息,并与FG5X绝对重力仪测量结果进行比较。测试结果表明:(1)RAI-g量子重力仪在市区和郊区不同噪声环境下均能实现正常连续绝对重力测量,观测过程中数据噪声类型以白噪声为主,重力值的观测精度优于2 μGal,准确度优于10 μGal;(2)RAI-g重力仪的灵敏度与重力观测站的背景噪声有关,采用位于市区武汉所站的观测数据计算的灵敏度为357 μGal/Hz
1/2
,郊区的九峰和襄樊两个站则分别是72 μGal/Hz
1/2
和89 μGal/Hz
1/2
。RAI-g量子重力仪在3个重力站均取得了优异的观测结果,但其长期稳定性仍需要更多的测试验证。
Objectives
2
Quantum gravimeters are an emerging gravity measurement technology with the potential to significantly change the field of gravity observation. These instruments are based on matter-wave interferometry and use cold atoms as test masses
enabling continuous absolute measurements of gravitational acceleration. Compared with traditional laser-interferometric absolute gravimeters
quantum gravimeters employ atomic matter waves with much shorter wavelengths and avoid mechanical friction by using microscopic atoms as test masses. In comparison with spring-based or superconducting gravimeters
quantum gravimeters combine continuous observation capability with absolute measurement
and are theoretically free from scale factor errors and instrumental drift. These characteristics give quantum gravimeters strong potential for acquiring high-quality gravity data.In recent years
quantum gravimeters have developed rapidly; however
most existing studies and tests have been conducted under laboratory conditions. As a result
their performance under field conditions is still not well understood. In addition
key performance indicators reported by instrument manufacturers
such as precision
accuracy
and stability
require independent verification through field experiments. Therefore
field testing of quantum gravimeters is essential for evaluating their practical observation capability
understanding the influence of environmental factors on instrument performance
and promoting their engineering development and practical application. Based on this background
this study focuses on the RAI-g quantum gravimeter and systematically analyzes its precision
accuracy
and stability under different environmental conditions through mobile observations at multiple stations
providing experimental evidence for its application in high-precision gravity measurements.
Methods
2
Field performance tests were carried out using the RAI-g quantum gravimeter developed by Huazhong University of Science and Technology. The instrument uses rubidium atoms as test masses and integrates key technologies including atomic matter-wave interferometry
real-time data acquisition and processing
and active vibration isolation. It features high measurement precision and good portability
making it suitable for mobile absolute gravity observations. The tests were conducted in a mobile observation mode in November 2020 at three sites in China: the Absolute Gravity Laboratory of the Institute of Seismology
China Earthquake Administration (Wuhansuo)
Jiufeng Seismic Station (Jiufeng)
and Xiangfan Seismic Station (Xiangfan). All three sites are equipped with stable gravity pillars
and the gravity reference at each site is maintained through repeated measurements with an FG5X absolute gravimeter
providing reliable reference gravity values.The background vibration environments at the three sites differ significantly. The Wuhansuo site is located in an urban area with frequent human activity and relatively high vibration noise. The Jiufeng station is located inside a cave
with a quiet environment and the lowest vibration level. The Xiangfan station is located in a suburban area
with vibration noise levels between those of Wuhansuo and Jiufeng. In addition
the absolute gravity values at the three sites differ by nearly 60 mGal
and the latitude and elevation conditions also vary
providing favorable conditions for a comprehensive performance evaluation of the instrument. The RAI-g quantum gravimeter completes one gravity measurement every 6 s and supports continuous observation. The observation duration at each site ranged from 3 to 15.2 h. All instrument operations during the tests were performed by manufacturer technicians
and the operators were unaware of the prior gravity values at the sites. After data processing
the RAI-g results were compared with the colocated FG5X absolute gravimeter measurements to evaluate the field performance of the instrument.
Results
2
The observation results show that the data distributions obtained by the RAI-g quantum gravimeter differ among the three sites. The data at the Jiufeng station are the most concentrated
followed by Xiangfan
while the Wuhansuo site shows the largest dispersion. This pattern is consistent with the background vibration noise levels at the sites
indicating that ground vibration is a major factor affecting the measurement quality of quantum gravimeters. During absolute gravity measurements
ground vibrations introduce errors by changing the relative position between the Raman reflection mirror and the freely falling atoms. The RAI-g quantum gravimeter uses an accelerometer to monitor vibrations in real time and applies vibration compensation
enabling stable continuous observations. Nevertheless
data quality is higher in low-noise environments.Using the FG5X absolute gravimeter measurements as reference values
a quantitative evaluation of the RAI-g results was performed. The observation precision of the RAI-g at all three sites is better than 2 μGal. In particular
the precision at Jiufeng and Xiangfan reaches 0.29 μGal and 0.44 μGal
respectively
achieving the microgal level. In terms of accuracy
defined as the difference between the mean observed value and the reference value
the results at Wuhansuo
Jiufeng
and Xiangfan are 1.70 μGal
-2.06 μGal
and 7.35 μGal
respectively
all better than 10 μGal. These results indicate that systematic errors of the instrument are well controlled.Outliers and random error distributions were further analyzed. Individual measurements differing from the mean of the observation series by more than three times the standard deviation were identified as containing outliers. The proportions of outlier observations at Wuhansuo
Jiufeng
and Xiangfan are 18‰
8‰
and 4‰
respectively
all less than 2% and comparable to those of the FG5X absolute gravimeter. This demonstrates that the RAI-g has good resistance to outliers. After removing outliers
the error histograms of the remaining data at all sites show approximately symmetric distributions with sums close to zero
consistent with the statistical characteristics of random errors and without evident systematic bias.Instrument stability was evaluated by calculating the Allan deviation of the continuous observation data. The sensitivities of the RAI-g at the Wuhansuo
the Jiufeng
and the Xiangfan are 357 μGal/Hz¹/²
72 μGal/Hz¹/²
and 89 μGal/Hz¹/²
respectively. The differences in sensitivity are mainly influenced by background vibration conditions. Quieter environments result in lower data dispersion and higher instrument sensitivity. At all sites
the Allan deviation curves continuously decrease with increasing integration time
indicating that white noise is the dominant noise type. No obvious colored noise was observed during the measurements
demonstrating good short-term stability of the instrument.In addition
the tests show that the instrument accuracy changed only slightly after short-distance transportation (from the Wuhansuo to the Jiufeng)
while a larger but still acceptable change was observed after long-distance transportation (from the Jiufeng to the Xiangfan). Even after long-distance transport
the accuracy remained better than 10 μGal
indicating that transportation may affect the instrument state to some extent
but the overall performance remains stable.
Conclusions
2
In conclusion
the RAI-g quantum gravimeter is capable of stable and continuous absolute gravity measurements under different environmental conditions. It achieves microgal-level precision
accuracy better than 10 μGal
good stability
and strong resistance to outliers. Background vibration noise at observation sites is the main factor affecting instrument sensitivity and data dispersion. However
with effective vibration monitoring and compensation
the instrument can maintain high data quality under field conditions. The RAI-g quantum gravimeter shows strong potential for applications in geodesy and geophysics. Future studies should include longer-term observations and tests under more complex environmental conditions to further evaluate its long-term stability and engineering adaptability
thereby supporting the broader application and further development of quantum gravimeters.
KASEVICH M , CHU S . Measurement of the Gravitational Acceleration of an Atom with a Light-Pulse Atom Interferometer [J]. Applied Physics B , 1992 , 54 ( 5 ): 321 - 332 .
HU Z K , SUN B L , DUAN X C , et al . Demonstration of an Ultrahigh-Sensitivity Atom-Interferometry Absolute Gravimeter [J]. Physical Review A , 2013 , 88 ( 4 ): 043610 .
MÉNORET V , VERMEULEN P , LE MOIGNE N , et al . Gravity Measurements Below 10–9 g with A Transportable Absolute Quantum Gravimeter [J]. Scientific Reports , 2018 , 8 : 12300 .
ZHOU L , XIONG Z Y , YANG W , et al . Measurement of Local Gravity via A Cold Atom Interferometer [J]. Chinese Physics Letters , 2011 , 28 ( 1 ): 013701 .
HUANG P W , TANG B , CHEN X , et al . Accuracy and Stability Evaluation of the 85Rb Atom Gravimeter WAG-H5-1 at the 2017 International Comparison of Absolute Gravimeters [J]. Metrologia , 2019 , 56 ( 4 ): 045012 .
WU B , WANG Z Y , CHENG B , et al . The Investigation of a ΜGal-Level Cold Atom Gravimeter for Field Applications [J]. Metrologia , 2014 , 51 ( 5 ): 452 .
FU Z J , WU B , CHENG B , et al . A New Type of Compact Gravimeter for Long-Term Absolute Gravity Monitoring [J]. Metrologia , 2019 , 56 ( 2 ): 025001 .
WANG S K , ZHAO Y , ZHUANG W , et al . Shift Evaluation of the Atomic Gravimeter NIM-AGRb-1 and Its Comparison with FG5X [J]. Metrologia , 2018 , 55 ( 3 ): 360 - 365 .
WU S Q , FENG J Y , LI C J , et al . The Results of 10th International Comparison of Absolute Gravimeters (ICAG-2017) [J]. Journal of Geodesy , 2021 , 95 ( 6 ): 63 .
王嘉沛 , 张新林 , 张毅 , 等 . 武汉九峰地震台重力变化与地壳垂直形变分析 [J]. 武汉大学学报(信息科学版) , 2022 , 47 ( 6 ): 964 - 971 .
WANG Jiapei , ZHANG Xinlin , ZHANG Yi , et al . Analysis of Gravity Variation and Vertical Crustal Deformation at Wuhan Jiufeng Seismic Station [J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University , 2022 , 47 ( 6 ): 964 - 971 .
NIEBAUER T M , BILLSON R , ELLIS B , et al . Simultaneous Gravity and Gradient Measurements from a Recoil-Compensated Absolute Gravimeter [J]. Metrologia , 2011 , 48 ( 3 ): 154 .
JIANG Z , PÁLINKÁŠ V , ARIAS F E , et al . The 8th International Comparison of Absolute Gravimeters 2009: The First Key Comparison (CCM.G-K1) in the Field of Absolute Gravimetry [J]. Metrologia , 2012 , 49 ( 6 ): 666 .
HUANG Yapeng , HU Minzhang , HAO Hongtao . Influence of Hydrometeorological Factors on Moble Gravity Variation in the Northern Xinjiang, China [J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University , 2022 , 47 ( 1 ): 85 - 92 .
PÁLINKÁŠ V , WZIONTEK H , VAĽKO M , et al . Evaluation of Comparisons of Absolute Gravimeters Using Correlated Quantities: Reprocessing and Analyses of Recent Comparisons [J]. Journal of Geodesy , 2021 , 95 ( 2 ): 21 .
邢乐林 , 李辉 , 李建国 , 等 . 陆态网络绝对重力基准的建立及应用 [J]. 测绘学报 , 2016 , 45 ( 5 ): 538 - 543 .
XING Lelin , LI Hui , LI Jianguo , et al . Establishment of Absolute Gravity Datum in CMONOC and Its Application [J]. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica , 2016 , 45 ( 5 ): 538 - 543 .
张新林 , 韩宇飞 , 汪健 , 等 . 2010—2018年中国大陆构造环境监测网络绝对重力仪比测结果分析 [J]. 中国地震 , 2020 , 36 ( 4 ): 872 - 878 .
ZHANG Xinlin , HAN Yufei , WANG Jian , et al . Comparisons of Absolute Gravimeters Measurements from Crustal Movement Observation Network of China During 2010 and 2018 [J]. Earthquake Research in China , 2020 , 36 ( 4 ): 872 - 878 .
LI Z Y , WANG Y , XING L L , et al . Investigating the Causes of a Rapid Gravity Decrease at the Luzhou Observatory [J]. Pure and Applied Geophysics , 2024 , 181 ( 2 ): 467 - 477 .
0
Views
1
下载量
0
CSCD
Publicity Resources
Related Articles
Related Author
Related Institution
京公网安备11010802024621